Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2010 8:29:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

His father Ron Paul is a NUT!


2 posted on 07/14/2010 8:34:48 AM PDT by Jmouse007 (Heavenly Father, deliver us from evil and from those perpetuating it, in Jesus name, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
(For one, he knows he blew the Rachel Maddow interview)

Good thing nobody saw it.............

3 posted on 07/14/2010 8:35:19 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. He's just some guy in the neighborhood.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I still don’t understand how he could have been so stupid to go on her, or any other PMSDNC freak show, him, or any self respecting Republican, or decent human, and not expect to get abused, slimed, slandered, screamed at, by any of these LibPerv LIARS? The only thing any Republican or Conservative can ever expect to get from going on *any* PMSDNC freak show, is a soupsong of STDs from sitting in the chairs that the usual parade of Leftie Perv “uests” sit in, while they spew their mutually supporting hate speech Leftie “progressive” lies on a daily basis.


4 posted on 07/14/2010 8:37:24 AM PDT by DGHoodini (Iran Azadi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul might not to be able to completely recover from the Maddow interview, but it would be nice if he would try to float a statement along the lines about how dismayed he is that after all the gains that were made in voting rights that the DOJ now stands by while racists intimidate voters without fear of prosecution. Bull Connor (A violent racist DEMOCRAT!) would be so proud!


5 posted on 07/14/2010 8:39:41 AM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Rand Paul knows he blew that Rachel Maddow interview, big time.

When Rachael Maddow is shown to be your intellectual superior, you have a lot to answer for.

6 posted on 07/14/2010 8:43:39 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

11. He (like his father) is a “fan of [atheist, pro-abortionist, adulterer, anti-altruist] Ayn Rand”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oD-R_OeP6tU

Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing.


7 posted on 07/14/2010 8:43:51 AM PDT by aSeattleConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Whoever advised him to go on the Rachel Maddow who, or whoever didn’t do everything in their power to talk him out of it, IS NOT HIS FRIEND.


8 posted on 07/14/2010 8:46:17 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Rand Paul said the Five Magic Words: “Nothing Is Off The Table” when it comes to cutting government spending.

Which I would assume would include Defense spending and the wars.

10 posted on 07/14/2010 8:55:51 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne
RE :”9. Rand Paul knows he blew that Rachel Maddow interview, big time. He totally owns up to it, says he knew that they had it in for him going into the interview but overestimated his own ability to shine through the media fog. “I was feeling my oats,” he says, sheepishly, and then shakes his head. Unspoken conclusion: That was stupid. He is understandably a little media-shy now

Yep, this one was pretty bad. If Republicans are not ready for political rhetorical war then need to stay the hell away from MSNBC. If you go on those shows you must be able to put the liberal hosts and guests on the defensive, not be on the defensive.

Yesterday someone from Heritage Foundation went on Mathhews Hardball to argue the economic merits of not paying unemployment compensation forever. Matthews repeatedly mistated his position never once correctly characterizing it to create a strawman that he could ridicule, two against one (Matthews and a liberal guest against him.) . Why don't Republicans study the shows they go on before they go on?

12 posted on 07/14/2010 9:04:07 AM PDT by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Wish I had more money. West and Rand should get some help for sure. Neck and neck and his 1, 2, and 3 issues are the deficit.


15 posted on 07/14/2010 9:18:35 AM PDT by Mere Survival (The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Trey Grayson needed to be knocked out of GOP politics, and Rand did it.

Paul leads Grayson among pro-lifers by a 50%-32% margin. Grayson leads Paul among pro-abortion Republicans by a 42%-27% margin.

Conservatives, Christians, social conservatives, and the statewide Kentucky voting population support Rand Paul.

“Conservatives favor Paul by 51 percent to 29 percent with 16 percent undecided. Those who attend religious services regularly or occasionally favor Paul by double-digit margins. Gun owners back Paul 48 percent to 22 percent with 22 percent undecided.”

Rand Paul leads by double digits among men and women, among conservatives, pro-life voters, gun owners.

“Grayson leads today only among the 1 in 5 Republican primary voters who say they are pro-choice.


19 posted on 07/14/2010 10:14:15 AM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson