[FrankR]

I watched that debate, and McCain't was pathetic; he cannot debate his past behavior because it was atrocious, and it was true.

It was the first time I had seen Hayworth, and frankly I got sort of the "joe isuzu" feeling from his style and delivery. It was too "prepared" and "scripted" to be natural, showing that he came prepared to go for the jugular.

The third guy, whose name escapes me, was more real and seemed more sincere, even though his delivery was not as polished and his public speaking inexerience showed...but he's all about the Constitution, and I like that.

But the grand loser of that debate, was McCain't.

[Nateman]

Hayworth did talk radio for years. He had plenty of practice to be polished.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

“[Hayworth] was too “prepared” and “scripted” to be natural, showing that he came prepared to go for the jugular.”

I remember hearing Hayworth speak in special late night sessions on the House floor. He is very proper and ‘old style’, even when it’s spontaneous. So I can understand your feeling if he still lacks the grit required of a presidential candidate.

As for the ticket splitter, he’s been slandering Hayworth maliciously. The only ‘sin-certiy’ in his voice is ‘sin’.