Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Phalanx Sensors Used In Laser Shoot Down Of Airborne Targets
Defense Talk ^ | 7/20/2010 | Defense Talk

Posted on 07/20/2010 1:01:43 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Raytheon and a U.S. Navy team used a combined-beam fiber laser to shoot down four unmanned aerial vehicles in flight during an over-the-water engagement.

The UAV targets were engaged and destroyed using the Navy's Laser Weapon System guided by Raytheon's Phalanx Close-in Weapon System sensor suite. LaWS is made up of six industrial-use lasers that simultaneously focus on the target.

"These engagements validate the operational viability of the Phalanx-LaWS combination at sea," said Dr. Taylor W. Lawrence, president of Raytheon Missile Systems. "The Raytheon- Navy team demonstrated the systems' capability to detect, track, engage and defeat dynamic targets at tactically significant ranges in a maritime environment."

For the test, the LaWS was mounted on a stable platform close to the Phalanx Block 1B mount. The Phalanx operator used the Block 1B's surface mode to perform electro-optical tracking and the system's radio frequency sensors to provide range data to the LaWS. When the Phalanx acquired the UAV, the LaWS destroyed the target.

"The Raytheon-Navy team is moving directed energy solutions toward utility in the battlespace to provide warfighters with speed-of-light protection," said Lawrence. "This shoot down leverages the significant investment the Navy has made in the Phalanx Close-in Weapon System and extends its combat-proven leadership in close-in defense systems."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; laser; phalanx; raytheon; uav; usnavy

1 posted on 07/20/2010 1:01:47 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Good, now rip out all those stupid RAM missile launchers that replaced the CIWS and install these.


2 posted on 07/20/2010 1:04:31 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Mr. Mojo; James C. Bennett; mowowie; Captain Beyond; darkwing104; JRios1968; ...

Ping


3 posted on 07/20/2010 1:09:09 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove
This is the Command Post.
There will be a test fire...

I will hear these words in my sleep for the rest of my life. :)

4 posted on 07/20/2010 1:25:41 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Phalanx, RAM’s and now these. Those are going to be some crowded stations.


5 posted on 07/20/2010 1:50:53 AM PDT by tanuki (Obamacare, Cap and Tax, Amnesty, in that order....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I think we got as far as proof of principle. We are a long way from an operational system.


6 posted on 07/20/2010 1:57:30 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Agreed, but going from the very versatile CIWS to the RAM system was a huge mistake for the Navy. This would seem to be a good way to get rid of some of the “twenty-one-and-done” launchers.


7 posted on 07/20/2010 2:02:29 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tanuki

The Navy’s been dumping CIWS for RAM launchers of late.


8 posted on 07/20/2010 2:03:50 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

“radio frequency sensors to provide range data”

What happens when the enemy applies stealth technology to missiles or unmanned drones?


9 posted on 07/20/2010 3:44:48 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
“radio frequency sensors to provide range data”
What happens when the enemy applies stealth technology to missiles or unmanned drones?
That's the battle space you are fighting in . . .

10 posted on 07/20/2010 4:26:31 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ( DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Cool!


11 posted on 07/20/2010 2:03:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Will must be the harder, courage the bolder, spirit must be the more, as our might lessens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

But — I thought that a missile defense shield was impossible? Remember. The Dems said that it is like a bullet shooting a bullet. Its a pipe dream. Star Wars like fiction it is.

Yeah, right.

Listen to Democrats and our security is toast.

Seems to work just fine (after years of Democrat delays).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTpP412fM8U&feature=player_embedded


12 posted on 07/20/2010 9:09:51 PM PDT by garjog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson