My Spidey sense began to tingle when on the same day the story broke, all of the Outer Party Members (i.e. Dem Apologists) were in lock step on how Fox was not a "real news organization", and since only Fox covered the story, it must either be insignificant or a fabrication.
Then lo an behold, "exculpatory" evidence of the full (and much better quality) video comes out which seems to portray the exact opposite of what Fox has been claiming (which upon full inspection it is quite obvious Outer Party Member Sherrod did not learn much from her parable after all).
Now the MSM decides they do have a front-page story after all, how Fox is bullying the White House due to journalistic malfeasance !
I smell a (Dem)RAT !!
It would seem to me that something like this would warrant at the very least a phone call.
If she knew about it, did the NAACP know about it? Who told her?
I have serious doubts about who gave the snippet to Breitbart. Is it the same person who gave the full video to NAACP? Is this person in any way personally affiliated with Ms. Sherrod?
There's more to this story - someone in the media (tv) needs to start asking these questions.
This smells of a set up!!!
What "exculpatory", just what portrays the "exact opposite", please? She says she had her mindset changed from black vs. white to rich vs. poor, but then continues on to make racist charge about having to endure "the Bushes" for eight years (still pondering the other Bush folks aside from Dubya) and says the reason Republicans oppose 0bama, the health care bill is that he is a black president. Sorry, but I just don't see what light was supposed to have gone on inside this woman's head.