Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The count right now is 57 Dems & 2 Independent for violating the Constitution. 41 Republicans against for now.

Call Ben Nelson, Mary Landreu, Blanche Lincoln, Jon Tessler along with all the Republicans, especially the Repubics.

1 posted on 07/27/2010 10:47:54 PM PDT by Steelers6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelers6

Oh, and talk to your friends and neighbors, so they start to hear from a variety of people.


2 posted on 07/27/2010 10:52:32 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Will RINOs actually resist temptation?

Enquiring minds want to know.


3 posted on 07/28/2010 12:57:15 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

The crats are in a panic. Wonder who Reid is paying off to get a vote? ANY Republican who votes for this is out.


4 posted on 07/28/2010 1:54:10 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Also, the NRA and AARP and maybe even the NAALCP favor this legislation.


5 posted on 07/28/2010 2:41:34 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6
The bill is an attack on the First Amendment and has only one purpose: to protect democrat incumbents.

Hopefully Reid and Schumer bring it up over and over so everyone can be reminded how sleazy they are.

6 posted on 07/28/2010 4:42:27 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Michael Savage had it right years ago. He said “in my day, Schmucky Schumer would have - at most - owned a dry cleaner shop in Brooklyn, maybe two”. Savage said it reflects just how far we have sunk that a two-bit shyster like this could ever be elected to public office, let alone to the once-vaunted United States Senate.


8 posted on 07/28/2010 5:32:38 AM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Landrieu doesn’t let constituents to contact her offices. That is unless you’ve donated heavily to her.


9 posted on 07/28/2010 7:34:21 AM PDT by rvoitier (Progressives are in the GOP, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Nelson’s office says he’s supporting it since he co-wrote the stinkin’ bill, FYI.


13 posted on 07/28/2010 11:08:58 AM PDT by Jane Long (America, while you were sleeping the Socialists took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelers6

Do these laws actually have any meaning when the Senate votes to confirm the most radical, non-constitutional (is that a word?), “legislate from the bench”, unqualified judges like Kagan? When laws WILL be changed/rewritten/or invented from the bench, it almost seems pointless to even worry about passing laws. The Left will get what they want one way or another.


15 posted on 08/06/2010 7:00:18 AM PDT by TheBattman (They exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson