>>> Wow. This is a new low, even for McVain.
Associated Press - August 10, 2010 11:14 PM ET
“”PHOENIX (AP) - John McCain’s Republican primary challenger suggests the country would be worse off had McCain won the 2008 presidential election.
Former congressman J.D. Hayworth has been arguing that McCain isn’t conservative enough.
Responding to a question at a Phoenix tea party meeting Monday, Hayworth says he doesn’t like President Barack Obama, but a moderate Republican would be even worse than the Democrat.””
The old saying applies. If you can’t run with the big dogs, stay on the porch.
Arizona voted for McCain for president. Telling all those voters they voted wrong was yet one more unnecessary foot in mouth blunder. One of many. He should stand by the remark if he means it, but shouldn’t whine like this if he gets spanked.
If McCain wins, it won’t be because of Palin. It will be giftwrapped from Hayworth. At the rate Hayworth is going he will do well to get even 25%.
Still defending Sarah huh?. Before her lovefest, JD was only about 5-10% behind McCain. Bottom line Palin’s hands are all over this McCain victory.
Really, it’s not a jump to say we would be as bad off had McVain won.
McVain has always gone FAR left once he’s won an election and doesn’t feel obligated to the voters. I think he would have caved to the Dims and his media sycophants, and it would have been branded with the GOP seal of approval. And that, my friend, would have been some seriously evil stuff. In some ways, Zer0bama doing evil is better in that it is clearly labeled in the right place. McVain may not have implemented as much destruction, but it would have the veneer of “bipartisan”, making the slide into socialism more palatable for the masses. At least with Zer0 we have a better focus for resistance.