Mark Morford, a writer and opinion columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle and SFGate, as well as a Vinyasa yoga teacher in San Francisco
Liberals think if they SAY something is irrefutable, that's the end of the argument--no need to show the 'irrefutable' evidence (which would convince everyone). Just SAY it exists and there ya go, you gotta agree with 'em!
The Author’s name is misspelled it’s actually Mark Morford.
Somebody really pays this clown to write????
I guess I don't object to his donut-punching gayness. You can be a deviant here, too.
What I object to, is Morford's abysmal writing skills.
He's atrocious.
I often wonder if there is a sinkhole big enough to swallow San Francisco ..... Chronicle .....whole. =.=
What is truly amazing is all the idiots like this who ignore the truth, summer this year, at least in the USA, was cooler than normal in many states, and south of the equator temps have been setting new winter time lows. I guess the concept of “global” warming means something entirely different to libs and only means certain areas that they can cherry pick and claim proves global warming. I am not talking about natural disasters, which we have always had, but temps themselves which disprove the global warming crap easily.
These people are ‘flat-earthers’ -thinking the universe revolves around them...
(I know my science is messed up in that sentence - but that’s what they are...)
Morford sounds like he’s dumber than a 5th grader. How old is this moron? Five?
Does homosexuality normally make one this insane, or is there another agent at work in Morford’s case? Maybe it’s demon possession. There are few this side of Hell who hate the Creator more, it seems. Morford is a special kind of nuts.
Oh, for goodness’ sake, no one reads Mark Morford...
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
That article takes Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming
Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article pretty much puts the kibosh on any serious trend of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign at all of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? Beyond the centuries long slow warming of the earth and rising of the seas of course. But that is only a few millimeters per century due to the inter-glacial period we are in.
Do they really think they could stop it? Can we stop volcanoes? Earthquakes? Hurricanes? Tornadoes?
Almost makes me wish those “homes” from the 50’s were still around.
Mark Morford, a writer and opinion columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle and SFGate, as well as a Vinyasa yoga teacher in San Francisco
Wally
You wanna quit placing every article in the Activism sidebar?
The globull warmongers must enjoy it for the fiction.
I guess it’s like going to a scary movie for them to make themselves all worried about the destruction of the planet.
No facts, just fear.
It’s an insult to Science.
*the worst this and the most violent that in 1,000 years*
I don’t think he goes over the top enough to prove his point. He should’ve said “eleventy zilliony years.”
