Obama to Propose Tax Write-Off for Business

NY Times ^ | 9/7/10 | Jackie Calmes

[Lou Budvis]

I like this idea since I’m self-employed.

[Kharis13]

Rush has mentioned this before and I think it bears repeating:

Why do the Dems always give tax cuts/breaks/credits when they want new businesses in their areas? They’re always so anti-tax, until they want growth, then they love to give tax breaks! Anyone see the irony here? Why aren’t they called out on it?

[Noamie]

Indeed - and “propose before the elections” is far different from “pass and sign after the elections”

I’d rather have a new Congress that would do better, smarter things, Barry...

[Myrddin]

A write off for capital equipment you don't need (no customers with money) and can't purchase (no lines of credit available). A big company like PacBell used equipment depreciation as a way to move revenues from the tax column back into an account to purchase new capital assets. It takes a big capital base to leverage that technique. The typical small business derives little advantage.

Extend the Bush tax cuts. Reduce tax rates further. Repeal Obamacare. That would pull the uncertainty off the horizon. As long as higher taxes and Obamacare are on the way, consumers will hold on to their money and businesses will have to reason to hire. People worried about just maintaining a job aren't going to commit to large purchases.

[Nonstatist]

Just for a year so the numbers look better, then comes the income tax and oil tax and all the other taxes. No thanks, Bark Obama.

[MNJohnnie]

If the GOP leadership was smart it would produce it OWN alternative bill and say “we agree with the President tax cuts are desperately needed to spur on the economy, however his bill doesn't do nearly enough, here is what we would do”.

The GOP loses when it lets the Dems set the debate in terms of with or against. Instead they should copy what Gingrich and the GOP did running up to the 1994 elections. Gingrich et al made sure every Democrat bill was mirrored by a GOP alternative. That forced the debate to be on WHICH set of ideas was better.

[Terry Mross]

So they write off 100% this year. What happens next year when they have no deductions at all?

[ex-snook]

The stuff business will buy from China?

[Alberta's Child]

Very good post. If they really want to create a true tax cut related to equipment purchases, they should permit businesses to write off more than 100% of the value of the equipment.

What's being proposed here, as you've pointed out, isn't really a "tax cut" at all.

[Buckeye McFrog]

not a bad concept, but he is talking about a short duration “quick hit” of capital spending. Will only shift future purchases ahead in the calendar and leave us twice as slow down the road, just like Cash for Clunkers and the homebuyer credit.

[Siena Dreaming]

At the same time he is proposing a $50 billion "infrastructure" infusion and "help" for underwater mortgages.

This mixed-bag effort is garbage.