Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hmmmm
1 posted on 09/07/2010 10:31:48 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Nachum

Desperation????


2 posted on 09/07/2010 10:33:28 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (RAT Hunting Season started the evening of March 21st, 2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

“...allowing businesses to deduct from their taxes through 2011 the full value of new equipment purchase...”

Ahhhhhhh...good. But tell me, Mr. POtuS, from where will we get the money to purchase the equipment to get the write off?

Ahole.


3 posted on 09/07/2010 10:33:39 AM PDT by jessduntno (Flush the Grand Old Potty. Change it top to bottom. Conservatives only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Obama, just get the hell out of the way!


4 posted on 09/07/2010 10:33:53 AM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Larry Lucido; Cagey; MotleyGirl70; Gamecock

Kramer : It’s just a write off for them .

Jerry : How is it a write off ?

Kramer : They just write it off .

Jerry : Write it off what ?

Kramer : Jerry all these big companies they write off everything

Jerry : You don’t even know what a write off is .

Kramer : Do you ?

Jerry : No . I don’t .

Kramer : But they do and they are the ones writing it off .


5 posted on 09/07/2010 10:34:51 AM PDT by earlJam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Desperation from the business hating democrats.


6 posted on 09/07/2010 10:35:59 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Character is defined by how we treat those who society says have no value.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Just to be clear:

This is not a tax cut. This is a tax deferral.

Normally, businesses depreciate capital equipment over a period of time, deducting only a percentage of the value each year. Allowing 100% depreciation in 2011 (it's too late for anything significant in 2010) simply means that a business can deduct the entire value in 2011.

If a particular item was normally on a 5-year depreciation schedule, the business would deduct 20% each year in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. Deducting 100% in 2011 means that there will be no deductions for depreciation of that item in the remaining 4 years.

Depending on what happens to corporate tax rates in the interim, the business could pay more or less taxes in the long run. But, if they stay the same (and the business's average tax rate remains the same), there is no net reduction in taxes.

8 posted on 09/07/2010 10:36:30 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Cars -- Cash for Clunkers, for a limited time.
Housing -- $8000 tax credit for limited time.
Business -- tax write-off, through 2011.

It's all smoke and mirrors. It's all "how can I look good for the next few months"? The man has no concept of deep changes that really grow an economy.

9 posted on 09/07/2010 10:36:45 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I’d rather see the voters write off Obama!


10 posted on 09/07/2010 10:37:36 AM PDT by G Larry (I'd rather see the voters write off Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

LOL!

Tax breaks for the rich?!?
How will that resonate with the class warfare theme that has soaked much of his voting base?


11 posted on 09/07/2010 10:37:39 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Rather then manufcature phoney tax credit gimmiacks, just cut the tax rates instead


12 posted on 09/07/2010 10:37:58 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is sooner or later you run out of other people's money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
What a clueless twit.

This is even worse than his plan to make loans available for small businesses to meet their payrolls.

13 posted on 09/07/2010 10:38:48 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't skipper a boat, Can't drive, Can't ski, Can't fly. But they KNOW what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I should have read the article first:

It would cost an estimated $200 billion in revenues, though the ultimate net loss would be $30 billion over 10 years, administration officials say, since businesses would eventually deduct the depreciated value of the equipment in any case.

I presume the projected $30 billion reduction over 10 years is the interest on the money that the government would have to borrow to fill the gap until they get the revenue from future tax receipts.

14 posted on 09/07/2010 10:39:58 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What Zero will not tell you is that these TCs are for his targeted industries, like “green” businesses. Will not pass.


16 posted on 09/07/2010 10:42:16 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Hmmmmm indeed. Is it a serious effort on the part of Obama? Or is he floating it out there expecting the Republicans to shoot it down so he can make a campaign issue of it?


18 posted on 09/07/2010 10:44:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

BIG desperation. It is a pure vapor ware lie. it has ZERO chance of passing and is just an election lie for the weak walleted.


19 posted on 09/07/2010 10:48:14 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This is more rhetoric over substance. These “breaks” will no doubt require compliance with strict government restrictions as to what type of equipment can be depreciated on this schedule. Why bother buying new equipment if there is no demand for a service or product. Furthermore, anything saved form depreciation will be eaten up by higher income, capital gains and health care taxes so why would business take the risk? To help do their share, hire workers and pay more in taxes? Right. This type of “bait and switch” happened with electronic medical records. Medical providers were promised rebates for buying electronic record systems but the requirement were so stringent that almost no one got the benefit.
This is just a way to say to the drone base and moderate Dims that he is really trying to help business. And when business does not respond, he will blame them for being greedy capitalist hoarders.


20 posted on 09/07/2010 10:49:31 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I like this idea since I’m self-employed.


21 posted on 09/07/2010 10:51:14 AM PDT by Lou Budvis (Refudiate 0bama '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Rush has mentioned this before and I think it bears repeating:

Why do the Dems always give tax cuts/breaks/credits when they want new businesses in their areas? They’re always so anti-tax, until they want growth, then they love to give tax breaks! Anyone see the irony here? Why aren’t they called out on it?


22 posted on 09/07/2010 10:52:31 AM PDT by Kharis13 (That noise you hear is our Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
A write off for capital equipment you don't need (no customers with money) and can't purchase (no lines of credit available). A big company like PacBell used equipment depreciation as a way to move revenues from the tax column back into an account to purchase new capital assets. It takes a big capital base to leverage that technique. The typical small business derives little advantage.

Extend the Bush tax cuts. Reduce tax rates further. Repeal Obamacare. That would pull the uncertainty off the horizon. As long as higher taxes and Obamacare are on the way, consumers will hold on to their money and businesses will have to reason to hire. People worried about just maintaining a job aren't going to commit to large purchases.

24 posted on 09/07/2010 10:54:29 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Just for a year so the numbers look better, then comes the income tax and oil tax and all the other taxes. No thanks, Bark Obama.


25 posted on 09/07/2010 10:55:43 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson