Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pox
“True Moral Authority” is neither earned nor relevant, but is a personal “belief” that springs from arrogance and a relative self-righteous predisposition.

Throughout history, good people have followed leaders who led them on a wholesome path.

Ex: In the last century Ronald Reagan and Winston Churchill seemed to people to have good moral compasses i.e. they considered them authorities who were moral...who had earned their trust through actions and words which reflected values in the Judeo-Christian mold.

This is not a revolutionary concept.

57 posted on 09/11/2010 11:36:20 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Siena Dreaming

Of course following leaders is not “revolutionary”, and I would never blindly follow any leader simply because they claimed to possess “moral authority”. It’s an age old fallacy that has caused misery, poverty and large scale slaughters throughout human history.

Nobody earns my trust without exhaustive research on my part, along with an ongoing review of that persons actions, traits and beliefs.

As a simple example, I present my own history. I volunteered for the U.S. Army while Reagan was president. I did not do so with any regard to the fact that he was our POTUS at the time. My reason was much more basic and simple. I was taught of the sacrifices and hardships borne by our forefathers that fought for our independence during the Revolutionary War. I believed that it was the least I could do. Nobody instilled those beliefs and values in myself, I came to my own conclusions after endless hours of reading about our ancestors.


59 posted on 09/12/2010 12:00:26 AM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson