Skip to comments.
Sen. Kaufman: GOP waging 'holy jihad' to extend tax cuts
The Hill ^
| SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
| Michael O'Brien
Posted on 09/20/2010 3:34:49 PM PDT by RobinMasters
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: RobinMasters
While I don’t like the term Kaufman used, I like the concept.
To: RobinMasters
So they want to go back to the Clinton tax rates? OK, then that means we go back to the Clinton budget plus 20% budget cut across the board the first year excluding defense?
22
posted on
09/20/2010 4:22:16 PM PDT
by
crz
To: Starboard
And apportionment doesnt? I mean we dont already pay for other states budget shortfalls? Think on it.
23
posted on
09/20/2010 4:24:36 PM PDT
by
crz
To: RobinMasters; ExTexasRedhead
The people saying this are the same who support the Ground Zero Mosque.
24
posted on
09/20/2010 4:31:50 PM PDT
by
Clintonfatigued
(Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
To: RobinMasters
This should make the voters of Delaware comfortable with Democrat representation. /sarc
25
posted on
09/20/2010 4:33:45 PM PDT
by
Truth is a Weapon
(If I weren't afraid of the feds, I would refer to Obama as our "undocumented POTUS")
To: RobinMasters
This would be a good time to use that time-worn expression "You can call it anything you want."
26
posted on
09/20/2010 4:58:24 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: RobinMasters
To: Starboard
Yep. I just wait for the ‘buzz words and phrases du jour’. I know Rush does it on his show.....but I wish all talk radio folks would just have a segment DAILY of the talking heads using the ‘talking points’ in a montage. It’s hysterical.
I can still remember the ‘hubris’ one when Bush was in office.
28
posted on
09/20/2010 6:16:15 PM PDT
by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(Not under the influence of Hope-nosis.)
To: crz
I mean we dont already pay for other states budget shortfalls?
Well yes, but those shortfalls are a drop in the bucket in comparison to the massive scale of gargantuan bailouts that are sure to come.
To: highlander_UW
I’d wager that Obama wouldn’t want to go down in history as the president who dissolved the nation
I’d wager that wouldn’t bother him in the least. To the contrary, Obama would consider it an accomplishment that would advance his vision of one world government. Remember, he is a globalist and an avowed “citizen of the world”. He is doing everything he can to destroy this country as we know it, and knows full well that the RECORD out-of-control spending during his administration will lead to catastropic consequences, particularly for future generations.
To: highlander_UW
FYI...this post has the text of Obama’s latest globalist schemes. It’s a so-called global development policy which is in reality global redistribution of wealth, largely at our expense. His agenda is to dismantle this once great country.
To: highlander_UW
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson