Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Except for prop 19, I agree. Gov’t has too big a hand in regulating a pretty harmless weed..


6 posted on 10/29/2010 2:00:03 PM PDT by adamjefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: adamjefferson

The no-discrimination clause is a deal breaker. As an employer, drug tests should be something I can use to screen out certain employees.


8 posted on 10/29/2010 2:04:24 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Support COD - "Cash on Delivery" for DE Senate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: adamjefferson

You are going to vote for Prop 19, so that in a year taxpayers can pay for drugs for those on welfare. Wow, you’re so libertarian. Until protections for taxpayers are put into the proposition for taxpayers, don’t delude yourself that you are anything else besides a big government liberal.


41 posted on 10/29/2010 5:24:57 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson