To: Interesting Times
Yep, I think you're right. Obama is not going to get behind a losing campaign even though it may be close. If that were the case he would be going to Nevada instead. I mean who is more important to Obama, Coons or the Senate Majority leader?
To: cameraman
14 posted on
10/30/2010 1:00:40 PM PDT by
Interesting Times
(SwiftVets.com. WinterSoldier.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: cameraman
Yep, I think you're right. Obama is not going to get behind a losing campaign even though it may be close. If that were the case he would be going to Nevada instead. I mean who is more important to Obama, Coons or the Senate Majority leader?
They can't send Obama to Nevada because that race is actually close, and Obama's presence there could lose it for Reid.
I'm sure Reid's campaign would desperately beg Obama not to come out there.
To: cameraman
I am in Delaware and I have received no confirmation that BO is coming back on Monday - and I am pretty well plugged in to these sorts of things. I will look for other sources of information.
31 posted on
10/30/2010 1:29:49 PM PDT by
mwl8787
To: cameraman
OTOH Obama has a huge ego and still hasn’t learned that his mere presence no longer guarantees victory. This is the guy who thought he could charm the world into giving him the Olympics just by gracing the selection committee with his presence. It will always be someone else’s fault. He has the ego of Nero and the maturity of a 7 year old.
Cindie
94 posted on
10/30/2010 6:34:39 PM PDT by
gardencatz
(Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
To: cameraman; Interesting Times
“he would be going to Nevada instead”
Unless...
He knows Dingy (”This war is lost”) Harry Reid’s RE-ELECTION IS LOST...
99 posted on
10/30/2010 7:02:21 PM PDT by
txrangerette
("...HOLD TO THE TRUTH; SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR." - Glenn Beck -)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson