She is going to all the work to make a 30-minute infomercial, then her campaign doesn't have the sense to buy airtime on stations people actually watch?
The only people that are going to see something on a Public Access Channel at 11:30 at night are not the voters that need to see it. Then again at 10 A.M. and 3 P.M.? Isn't Public access free airtime? Why? 'Cuz nobody watches!
That said, if the vaunted Channel 28 did purposely sabotage her campaign, lawsuits and jail time are in order
Are you aware of the cost of a 30 minute spot on a major network? Did you ever consider the possibility that she didn't have the money to spend on such an ad until recently, since she isn't getting help from the RNC? And if that's the case, doesn't it say something positive about a candidate who is not willing to spend money she doesn't have? Wouldn't said candidate be ideal to protect our taxpayer dollars?