Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party gets foothold in Congress
UPI ^ | Nov. 3, 2010 | UPI

Posted on 11/03/2010 4:05:08 AM PDT by mdittmar

The Tea Party, which didn't exist two years ago, came out of the 2010 midterm elections as an influential force in contemporary American politics.

The movement, which is not, strictly speaking, a formal political party, finished with a mixed win-loss record in congressional and gubernatorial races -- posting victories over established, veteran political figures while losing some of its higher profile contests -- including U.S. Senate races in Nevada and Delaware.

One of the movement's highest priorities was to defeat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, but he rode a larger than expected turnout -- particularly among Latino voters -- to victory over Republican nominee Sharron Angle.

Speaking to supporters Tuesday night, Angle said the Tea Party is really "Main Street America."

"We were able to inspire not only Nevadans but a country," she said. "America was waiting, was anxious, was desperate to support us."

In Delaware, Christine O'Donnell lost to Democratic Senate nominee Chris Coons but said, after the outcome was clear, "we won."

O'Donnell said her upset win over the GOP establishment candidate in the primary means "the Delaware political system will never be the same. ... The Republican party will never be the same."

Marco Rubio, a Tea Party-backed candidate for the U.S. Senate in Florida, won his race and said in his victory speech it would be "a grave mistake to view this as an embracing of the Republican Party.

"It's a second chance ... to be what they said they would be so long ago," he said.

Jenny Beth Martin, a co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, which coordinates chapters nationally, told The New York Times U.S. voters "admitted the mistakes they made two years ago" in Tuesday's elections. However, she echoed Rubio when she said the outcome was "not a Republican victory."

Another major priority for the Tea Party, one that was shared by establishment Republicans and conservatives in general, was to displace House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a San Francisco Democrat who will likely turn the speaker's gavel over to House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio.

"We are about to do the one thing that the American people want done, and that is to fire Pelosi," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele told a party rally in Washington Tuesday night.

However, the success of Tea Party-backed House candidates could pose a problem for Boehner, Politico reported, forcing him to deal with a divided GOP caucus that will include freshmen members who see themselves as new revolutionaries -- while trying to work with veteran committee chairmen and a Democratic Party caucus that will be considerably more liberal because so many conservative Democrats were turned out Tuesday.

Boehner will also have to work with President Barack Obama but the two have scarcely had a working relationship to date, Politico said.

"We hope President Obama will now respect the will of the people, change course, and commit to making the changes they are demanding," Boehner continued. "To the extent he is willing to do this, we are ready to work with him."

The White House issued a statement Tuesday night saying Obama called Pelosi and Boehner, as well as House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

"In his calls with Rep. Boehner and Sen. McConnell, the president said he was 'looking forward to working with him and the Republicans to find common ground, move the country forward and get things done for the American people,'" the White House statement said.>


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2010midterms; de2010
we've only just begun,white lace and promises,a kiss for luck and we're on our way.;)
1 posted on 11/03/2010 4:05:10 AM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

They dismissed as fascists, nuts and cranks. The MSM’s beebers got stunned big time!


2 posted on 11/03/2010 4:07:07 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I'd vote for Santelli, just because. ;)

No ID required to vote here, I offered and they refused. Guessing the AG won as there is one democrat running unopposed. My votes are in Good hands. /sarc
3 posted on 11/03/2010 4:11:01 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The Tea Party lost in Connecticut and Nevada because it had lousy candidates.

The one couldnt get over being called a witch and the lady in Nevada stuck her foot in her mouth daily.

Tie that in with a Democrat voting Machine and you lose.


4 posted on 11/03/2010 4:17:27 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I fogot to add that the Republican Party insiders did little to help either of these ladies.


5 posted on 11/03/2010 4:19:13 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar

The Tea Party must address the biggest issue coming up as soon as possible, repealing Obamcare completely.


6 posted on 11/03/2010 4:20:57 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (If your enemy is quick to anger, seek to irritate him. Sun Tzu, The Art of War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

STUNNED MSM BEEBERS! With a Viking Kitty ZOT for good measure. - Looks like Obama’s push for the illegals to “punish” their enemies (us) helped Harry Reid hang on; but Queen Nancy is FIRED!


7 posted on 11/03/2010 4:23:58 AM PDT by Twinkie (TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
First they ignored us.

Than they mocked us.

Than they fought us.

Than WE won.

8 posted on 11/03/2010 4:29:33 AM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free, Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I believe you meant Delaware and Nevada ...but I would disagree w/some of your analysis regarding Delaware. If you look at the demographics of the vote, Christine O'Donnell carried enough of the Independents to win; but, 12% of the REPUBLICANS (think Rove, Castle, Moderates/RINOs) crossed over and voted for the DEMOCRAT).

I will agree that O'Donnell could have been a better candidate and had a terrible ad campaign; but, she was the Republican nominee and I believe she did the best she was capable of in the time she had to “get up to speed” for a Senate race.

What infuriates me is the fact that Rove, Castle and the other “Moderates” either actively or passively worked against O'Donnell AFTER she won the Republican Primary. This arguably made the difference between a Senate win in the Republican column and one in the Dems column. Similar treacherous situation for Miller in Alaska, it appears, if the “write in” votes are all verified for Murkowski.

Bottom line: It is crystal clear to me that the RINO’s/Moderates will not support Conservative candidates when “our guy” wins the Republican Primary; but, they expect us to support “their guy” when they win. Same thing happened here in VA when Ollie North was running for the Senate. Our Republican Senator, John Warner, endorsed the Dem and North lost.

I am a Conservative in every sense of the word and I've supported and voted for all the GOP candidates here in VA since I became eligible to vote 41 years ago; many of these have been Moderates; but, if a RINO/Moderate is nominated next time I will go 3rd Party or stay home; as I have finally, painfully, had to conclude this is the only way to bring about Conservative change. Following the Moderate/RINO herd is merely incremental extinction for Conservatives.

9 posted on 11/03/2010 4:57:47 AM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

“The Tea Party lost in Connecticut and Nevada because it had lousy candidates.”

You’re not saying that Reed is a stellar statesman, are you? It’s more likely that Reid won because the state has more howling left wing moonbats than conservatives.


10 posted on 11/03/2010 4:58:15 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

I am not saying that Reid is a great statesman, I am saying Angle kept sticking her foot in her mouth. She wasnt a good candidate.

Certainly the Reid Democrat machine was tough and crooked, but a good candidate could have beaten him.


11 posted on 11/03/2010 5:48:24 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

I am in agreement with you, The GOP is the major one to blame for her loss.


12 posted on 11/03/2010 5:50:13 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Yes! Karl Rove was all over claiming we would not repeal obamacare. We would “reform” the monster. He’s gotta protect Romney. If Republicans reject Obamacare, they reject Romneycare.

Republican leadership in the house need to get to Rove and tell him to get with the program. We ain’t George’s compassionate socialist rulers anymore. That dog does not hunt.


13 posted on 11/03/2010 6:36:19 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mware

THEN

THEN

THEN


14 posted on 11/03/2010 7:42:39 AM PDT by teeman8r (Shove It Beck, we like the costumes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson