Yeah. Three years to the day since Hot Air reprinted old news from 2006.
Go sell crazy somewhere else, were all stocked up here.
Posted on 11/11/2010 1:46:11 AM PST by Sprite518
Comes from Sorcha Faal = Sucha Fool
Old news. That happened while the Clinton/Bush crowd was gutting the navy. The navy wanted more money.
Yeah. Three years to the day since Hot Air reprinted old news from 2006.
Go sell crazy somewhere else, were all stocked up here.
Didn't the missle happen on the 8th and the sub happen on the 10th?
It’s just a contrail. An optical “allusion”.
Our government lied to us when it told us to dismiss the reports that North Korea sank a boat with a torpedo.
Our government lied to us when it told us that the Ft. Hood shooting was not terrorism (even still there are some trying to say it was just workplace related violence).
Our government lied to us when it told us that the Charles Bishop/Bishra plane being flown into a bank in Florida wasn't terrorism (and they were in posession of his suicide note which pledged support for Bin Laden and suppressed it for several months).
Our government lied to us when it told us the outbreak of anthrax deaths following 9-11 was not terrorism.
When people have letters and communications and insist that terrorists are not really terrorists, then I will hold official announcements with skepticism.
marking
I suspect that, if anything, the response time would've been even slower had Obama been in the country.
Thanks for the ping.
Here are some other 'optical illusions'.
Here’s the post later in the old thread with the ref’d NWO quotes . . . the earlier post was pulled because of no ref:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2130557/posts?page=129#129
The sub incident was reported on the 10th and obviously happened a couple of days before.
INDEED.
1. A tomahawk doesn’t have the launch profile we saw in the video. It arcs over so the missile can FLY to its target since it is a CRUISE missile.
2. Unless a submarine is on the surface, you’d NEVER launch a tomahawk against a sub. Even then the sail is pretty small. You’d use an ASROC (ASW Rocket with an ASW TORPEDO) is what you would launch on a sub. You might use a standard missile (SM-2 or SM-3) in ASuW mode since it is on the surface. If it was sub doing the attack, you’d use a freakin torpedo.
3. We would not “instantly” retaliate for a strike on a cruise ship. That’s nuts. We’d show the evidence to the world for instant world-wide condemnation for an attack against civilians. This would bring moral justification and world support for whatever military action we decided to take.
4. If China were going to risk a war, they’d do it Japanese style and make sure it was a big enough strike to avoid our retaliation.
5. If China wanted us to stop quantitative easing, they’d simply stop lending to the US government (or more likely, reduce the amount they lend rather than cold turkey). That would force us to change our policy. Their economic club would be incredibly more powerful and more precise weapon.
6. The USS Ronald Reagan was already at sea for training and responded to the Carnival ship with cold food supplies ... most notably SPAM according to news reports.
It’s more likely we were launching a missile against alien spacecraft than what this “article” proposes!!!
But the contrail / plume from the video is definitely a missile, not a plane. A plane leaves a split contrail that is not as concentrated as that in the video. And the video clearly shows the flame of a missile. If it wasn’t an accident, then it would have to be something we wanted to put in space (or test on Pacific coast missile range) that we didn’t want anyone to have advance notice watch. It’s the most sane explanation I can think of. A test of something in one of the black projects.
I was drawing an “allusion” to another story.
Ooooops, sorry.
It is breaking very slowly.
I KNOW THAT. There was a reason why I posted it. LOL!
I KNOW THAT. There was a reason why I posted it. LOL!
2007... To the day. Connect the dots smart guy....
But I guess you believe it was an airplane right? LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.