Skip to comments.
TSA Should Try to Make Airport Screening Less Intrusive (Hillary wonders off the reservation)
Fox News ^
| 11/21/2010
| ap
Posted on 11/21/2010 9:50:40 AM PST by tobyhill
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says officials should try to make the new airport security measures, including full body scans and intimate pat-downs, less intrusive.
Clinton says there's clearly a need for the tighter security. But she says the government should explore ways to "to limit the number of people who are going to be put through surveillance."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hillaryclinton; nooinwanders; tsa; tsapervs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
1
posted on
11/21/2010 9:50:42 AM PST
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
2
posted on
11/21/2010 9:51:38 AM PST
by
trebb
("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
To: trebb
3
posted on
11/21/2010 9:52:26 AM PST
by
tobyhill
To: tobyhill
Instead of saying limit the number of people put through surveillance, how about limiting the number of people subjected to sexual assault? Or eliminating the sexual assault part altogether?
4
posted on
11/21/2010 9:52:38 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(Being "mad as hell" just won't cut it.)
To: trebb
You betcha.
My guess is she’ll announce after the first of the year, maybe sooner if Bam continues to step in it.
5
posted on
11/21/2010 9:54:38 AM PST
by
bigbob
To: trebb
Absolutely.
She seems multiple openings and is going to strike at them.
I firmly believe that every viable GOP candidate looking to take the Oval Office needs to consider the fact that Hitlery might very well be their opponent for the 2012 election.
It’s not inconceivable that she could oust 0 in the primary.
6
posted on
11/21/2010 9:54:48 AM PST
by
MWS
(De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum. - Thomas á Kempis)
To: tobyhill
Ah, the i’ll be a better next president speech.....
7
posted on
11/21/2010 9:54:51 AM PST
by
GSP.FAN
(Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints.)
To: trebb
Yep. She'll run against Duh Won as a "centrist"--a "reasonable, common-sense" cryptoMarxist.
The media (CNN especially) are shifting slightly right to cover.
She will claim to be the reasonable voice of the Democratic Party. After all, Obama has already got most of the crap she couldn't passed.
8
posted on
11/21/2010 9:55:11 AM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: tobyhill
Who would want to pat down that dried up old bag!?
To: tobyhill
What bull! It’s “less intrusive” if they limit the number of people that get it? Not to those people!
It’s less intrusive if they STOP. I’d say that she’s well on her way to “Presidency, Obama Style”, though.
10
posted on
11/21/2010 9:56:03 AM PST
by
Zarro
(Hands off Our Junk!)
To: tobyhill
Profile and search MUSLIMS.
11
posted on
11/21/2010 9:58:21 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: tobyhill
MS Clinton has begun her campaign. She plans to run.
12
posted on
11/21/2010 9:58:27 AM PST
by
dforest
To: tobyhill
Hillery is right, but she is not saying so to benefit the people and to preserve their 4th amendment rights. She is saying so out of a sense of self preservation.
Its not about her getting an Obama’s TSA goose, thats for sure.
13
posted on
11/21/2010 10:00:11 AM PST
by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
To: tobyhill
We have ONLY MUSLIMS TO BLAMS FOR THIS CRAP....OBAMA INCLUDED!!
14
posted on
11/21/2010 10:00:50 AM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: Smokin' Joe
Bingo, I knew she would run as the voice of reason. gag, but she will, evoking how her husband was smart enough to know this...and well, so is she.
all hail Hillary *snort*
15
posted on
11/21/2010 10:01:33 AM PST
by
dforest
To: indylindy
I think so too...and as a side note, the conversation about any political opponent that the GOP puts forward should not be looking at who can beat Obama (Mickey Mouse could be Obama if he stays on his present path) but who can beat Hillary, and why they could beat Hillary.
16
posted on
11/21/2010 10:01:41 AM PST
by
dawn53
To: dawn53
I so totally agree!
They should plan on Hillary and be prepared for Obama.
17
posted on
11/21/2010 10:03:19 AM PST
by
dforest
To: tobyhill
she says the government should explore ways to "to limit the number of people who are going to be put through surveillance."
Let's see, there's a perfectly RATIONAL way to do that, but liberals have smeared all who advocate 'profiling'.... you can't even have a rational discussion with any liberal about 'profiling'....
18
posted on
11/21/2010 10:04:35 AM PST
by
Enchante
(What if the Olberdork returned to the air - and no one notices.... or cares?)
To: Smokin' Joe
The media (CNN especially) are shifting slightly right to cover. She will claim to be the reasonable voice of the Democratic Party. After all, Obama has already got most of the crap she couldn't passed. Yup...good call. The media started their turn to Hillary after them midterms. They got their marching orders and are in full retreat from Obama...but NOT really the policies.
To: Candor7
Obama just got finished justifying the sexual assaults then Hillary distanced herself from the pervert parade.
You're right, she knows this situation is going to backfire on Obama and the TSA.
20
posted on
11/21/2010 10:06:10 AM PST
by
tobyhill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson