To: Jim Robinson
Fourth, if the debt ceiling is to be raised, this is the last time. This isn't necessary. If we lock spending back at 2008 levels and return unspent TARP funds back into the treasury, we wouldn't need to raise it.
8 posted on
11/22/2010 1:06:23 PM PST by
mnehring
To: mnehring
Yup. I would hold the line on raising the debt ceiling.
NO COMPROMISE!!
9 posted on
11/22/2010 1:09:00 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
To: mnehring
If we lock spending back at 2008 levels and return unspent TARP funds back into the treasury, we wouldn't need to raise it [the debt ceiling]. I agree with you completely. This is the one part of the letter that disappoints me. Other than that, rock on!
20 posted on
11/22/2010 1:20:57 PM PST by
lonevoice
(Where the Welfare State is on the march, the Police State is not far behind)
To: mnehring
>>>This isn't necessary. If we lock spending back at 2008 levels and return unspent TARP funds back into the treasury, we wouldn't need to raise it.
No, you would still need to raise it. Even with thise cuts, the budget would be operating at a deficit (recall that thebudget was in deficit in 2008) and would require a raising of the debt ceiling.
24 posted on
11/22/2010 1:30:25 PM PST by
NC28203
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson