Posted on 11/30/2010 8:14:38 PM PST by lakeprincess
The New York Times continues to showcase WikiLeaks on its front page, and will continue for the next six days. But observant critics want to know: Why didn't the newspaper give the same star treatment to the infamous leaked Climate-gate e-mails of a year ago? Those communiques revealed that climate scientists manipulated weather data to suit an eco-alarmist agenda
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
The obvious answer is because one event dovetails nicely with the NYT’s agenda, the other didn’t. Why anyone would consider the NYT anything but leftist propaganda is beyond me. I don’t see how they can claim to be a “news” organization when they don’t report news with anything even approaching impartiality. Not even in the same zip code with it...
I doubt that many people remain who do not know that the Times is extremely biased. The fact that it still remains afloat (barely) is testimony to the huge ultraliberal population in New York City. I don’t see any other way it can be explained.
Because they’re Com-mu-nists!
Because they’re Com-mu-nists!
BTTT
ClimateGate emails were intended to be "private correspondence" was the excuse the NYSlimes offered for not covering that important story which put the lie to the anthropogenic global warming scam in the words of the very perps themselves ... so the WikiLeak docs were not intended to be private correspondance, Mr. Keller, Mr. Pinch?
Right.
Serial dishonesty plus lack of journalistic integrity in delivering the news is proving not to be such a good business model.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.