Posted on 12/01/2010 8:25:32 AM PST by markomalley
The Apostles <(not including Saul since he was NOT an Apostle and yes most of what he wrote was deceitful as it was his oppions that comprise his letters and not direct quotes of what Yahushua said since he was NOT present with Yahushua and spent next to no time with the Apostles save in Jerusalem in ~50CE)>did not know the word "Jesus" or "Christ" but they did know Yahushua and Yahuweh and Chrestaunous (the Roman term for the followers of the Way).
That the writers post John's death (2nd century+) of the “New Testament” purposely mis-translated the Scriptures is evidence that Yahuweh has given us freewill to mock and abuse the gifts He has bestowed on us.
Superior knowledge is something you have in abundance but next to no knowledge of history or Satan's deceitful behavior. The “errors” is not my view but is readily acknowledge by hundred's of scholars but you would have to look as only a few of them fully express the information.
The 1st century Chrestuanous would only know Scriptures if they went to the Synagogue as there were not readily available text from which to study but you already knew that so why be coy ?
So this is as far as I care to engage your displayed ignorance.
If you want to “study” the matter further than try the most in-depth current Scriptures translation at
http://www.yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis_Reshith.YHWH
http://www.yadayahweh.com/Yada_Yahweh_Genesis_Shabat.YHWH
Of course God can do anything, but what he can do beyond our ability to understand is not defined by us or created in our imaginations.
“Our faiths are the ultimate relativisms.”
Except Christian faith, which is supported by objective evidence. From the all the things of creation, to Christ’s empty tomb and eyewitnesses to the risen Christ.
No it isn’t, we don’t even know what it is...but it still exists, right?.
Objective evidence as related/referenced to scripture, correct?
I use the term objective evidence in reference to events accepted by most mainstream scholars as historical record.
Feminists are awfully evil, aren’t they? I guess one should never attribute to malice what may be explained by ignorance, but how ignorant are they?
I use the term relative when references are used.
This is not a little debate between you and me. It’s a battle you’re having with truth, completely independent of my involvement.
I disagree. All this is, is a discussion on an anonymous internet forum, a way to pass time, a little entertainment...nothing more.
Sounds like you’re trying to reassure yourself.
No, just correcting your mistaken assumption.
Sure.
Look. If all you’ve got left, is to tell me about why I say what I do and why and how I really feel, then we may as well end this discussion now. All you’re doing is wasting my time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.