Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

All the more reason to say no to this.
1 posted on 12/10/2010 8:24:18 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Qbert

Businesss (corruption) as usual among the Elitists in DC. Apparently, November 2nd wasn’t loud enough. 2012 must be a bigger and louder message.


2 posted on 12/10/2010 8:28:08 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

David Freddoso writes:

“Remember all of those special interest tax breaks in the 2008 TARP bill?

- Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)
- Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)
- Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)
- American Samoa (Sec. 309)
- Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)
- Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)
- Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)
- Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)
- Railroads (Sec. 316)
- Auto Racing Tracks (317)
- District of Columbia (Sec. 322)
- Wool Research (Sec. 325)

Many of them are back. Although I’m not sure yet whether the “research credit” is for “wool research.”

-Research credit.
-Indian employment tax credit.
-New markets tax credit.
-Railroad track maintenance credit.
-Mine rescue team training credit.
-7-year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes.
-Accelerated depreciation for business property on an Indian reservation.
-Election to expense mine safety equipment.
-Special expensing rules for certain film and television productions.
-Expensing of environmental remediation costs.
-Deduction allowable with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico.
-Tax incentives for investment in the District of Columbia.
-Temporary increase in limit on cover over of rum excise taxes to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
-American Samoa economic development credit.”

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2010/12/oh-christmas-tree-tarp-special-interest-provisions-reappear-bipar


3 posted on 12/10/2010 8:28:16 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Just more bribes. These people should be in jail.


4 posted on 12/10/2010 8:29:58 AM PST by Roklok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Footsies


5 posted on 12/10/2010 8:32:03 AM PST by FrankR (Don't let the bastards wear you down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Senate tax bill lures Democrats with sweeteners

Artificial sweeteners loaded with carcinogens.

6 posted on 12/10/2010 8:33:53 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The article doesn’t list how long the extensions are for the democrat’s pork. My guess would be the pork would be extended for 5 years (or longer) while the tax cuts are only extended for 2 years. If they are smart, the Republicans should reject the entire bill because of the added pork.


10 posted on 12/10/2010 8:40:46 AM PST by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Ah, Good ol’ earmatks are back.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 8:49:00 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Didn’t know they won the election, so why are we spending more pork?

Merry Christmas


14 posted on 12/10/2010 8:49:49 AM PST by bray (Sarah Palin will destroy the Repub Party, hopfully!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Continuing the Ethenol and energy boondoggles?


16 posted on 12/10/2010 8:51:53 AM PST by bray (Sarah Palin will destroy the Repub Party, hopfully!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Let’s count the earmarks, shall we?

1. tax break for mass transit users
2. an ethanol tax credit
3. grant program for renewable energy developers
4. tax break for coal plants,
5. tax break for “energy-efficient homes”
6. tax break for hybrid cars
7. tax break for mine safety equipment
8. tax break for child care
9. tax break for college
10.tax break for adoption expenses

Eveybody’s a winner!


17 posted on 12/10/2010 9:00:09 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Continuing the lower tax rates only temporarily is hard enough to swallow. Why in the world would we want to offer them any “sweeteners”? Just let them vote it down as it was negotiated between the WH and the GOP and let them look like idiots when their forced to accept a worse deal (in their eyes) come Jan. We have to play hardball with these clowns.


18 posted on 12/10/2010 9:26:11 AM PST by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

F NO!


20 posted on 12/10/2010 10:16:58 AM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Senate tax bill lures Democrats with sweeteners bribes.

I fixed it :)

21 posted on 12/10/2010 10:18:17 AM PST by mewzilla (Hey, Schumer, how's that Lockerbie bomber deal investigation coming along?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson