Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Van Hollen...insisted that Senate Republicans, in striking the deal with the president, had not insisted on a provision of setting the tax of 35 percent on estates over $5 million as a "central portion of this deal."

-Is he putting words into their mouths, or is this true?...

1 posted on 12/12/2010 7:56:56 PM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Qbert

He pushed backed against criticism of the deal from some on the right, admitting “there are parts of this bill I do not like.”

“But the worst thing we can do is hit the economy with an across the board tax increase in January,” he said. “If we don’t pass this then we will have damage.”

Paul Ryan and the rest of the Republicans still don’t have a clue.


2 posted on 12/12/2010 8:01:44 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

This whole bill stinks to high heaven. The Republicans, it looks like, haven’t learned a thing in the last election. They ar about to pass a bill that is nothing more than give away the treasury for the next 50 years. The spending attached would demand that taxes go up just to pay for it. I would be more than pleased if the bill were defeated or dropped and they started over again next year.


3 posted on 12/12/2010 8:05:35 PM PST by engrpat (A village in Kenya is missing their idiot...lets send him back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

Fine, scuttle it. Give the country a taste of higher taxes and expired unemployment benefits for 3 weeks, then start over on Jan 21st when they’ll be clamoring for even MORE tax cuts - and deep spending cuts to go with it!


4 posted on 12/12/2010 8:05:55 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

No Deal!

5 posted on 12/12/2010 8:06:27 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward with Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

By the time this cold front makes its way from the Ohio river valley to Foggy Bottom, the Democrats might have to stick their hands in their own pockets.
(**baddaboom**)


6 posted on 12/12/2010 8:07:36 PM PST by tumblindice (We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready to do violence in the night. Eric Blair)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The estate tax is disgusting. You work hard your whole life to leave something for your kids and the greedy politicians want to take it from them!!


10 posted on 12/12/2010 8:09:55 PM PST by Carbonsteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

I hope it fails. The GOP can do better next year without running up the deficit. This has become TARP2


15 posted on 12/12/2010 8:16:35 PM PST by GeronL (#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

It’s just damn confounding to me as to how a political party could be so dedicated/addicted to sticking it to people by using taxes.

They would have no problem at all giving unemployment checks to someone indefinitely, but feel that the government should step in and CONFISCATE what’s left of someone’s life’s work when they die and leave it to their children. It’s truly sick!

I can’t even begin to put myself in their place.

Let’s face it. Through their actions, it’s obvious that the democrats and liberals HATE anyone that succeeds and becomes wealthy. They punish the successful with their policies. Where they are shortsighted is they NEED wealthy people for taxes to fund their programs. Eventually they are going to keep this shit up until they kill their golden goose. Capital flight is going to be a bitch for them.


16 posted on 12/12/2010 8:17:57 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

If there is gridlock on the death tax, the Feds will get 18% of the first dollar of inheritance graduated up to 55% at five million. There are a lot of progressives that want just this. This will be higher once the states get their mitts on your folkes hard earned and already taxed money. From each according to their ability, to each according to their need.


18 posted on 12/12/2010 8:32:12 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Rep Anthony Weiner (D-NY)was explaining to Megan Kelly on Friday.......’you don't pay a tax on your estate when you die; you're dead. For your heirs it's just free money. It should be taxed’. This is the way the Dems think. Your money actually belongs to the Federal Govt. They just let you keep some of it sometimes.
21 posted on 12/12/2010 8:45:00 PM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
Robber Pictures, Images and Photos
22 posted on 12/12/2010 8:50:59 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert
House Democrats are still going to make an effort to lop out at least one controversial provision: the estate tax.

In 1776, this was called "double taxation". Today, we call it "business as usual".

How times have changed!

24 posted on 12/12/2010 9:54:27 PM PST by DustyMoment (Go green - recycle Congress in 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The death tax should die..... who do these assholes think they are trying to steal inheritance


25 posted on 12/13/2010 3:34:27 AM PST by The Wizard (Madam President is my President now and in the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson