Posted on 12/14/2010 6:12:11 AM PST by george76
Begging the Question Logical Fallacy
The question is did Lakin refuse to disobey the lawful orders of three superior officers. Why he did it isn't important.
Why he did it is because he thinks the orders might be illegal. To disallow the "why" argument is to disallow his defense, questioning the legality of the orders.
Also, to disallow the "why" is a result of Begging the Question, assuming the orders are legal.
I doubt it..
Have you seen John F..ing Kerry’s war records?
(again, he claims to have torched civilian homes/huts)
Caught in an ABSOLUTE LIE when he claimed Admiral Zumwalt presented the Silver Star to him-Kerry did not realize the Admiral was still alive and smacked John good.
Seen Kerry’s school records?- claims he let a reporter look at them ...
Al gore- where do we start.. any war records?- quick, how
many colleges was he kicked out of? (Ans=2)seen
his college transcript?
Bubba- he left college in England.. right.. he was expelled
and pleaded guilty to rape- any records?
Hillary- where do we start...
If you are hoping for ANY American Newspaper to Release
a leftisit/communist “records- you are dreaming) We needed
Congressman and Senators to have challenged Barack-hussein
long before now- they allowed this Communist to become president- we’re screwed
This man’s life is not worth $10 to the One.
No, pointing out reality.
Why he did it is because he thinks the orders might be illegal. To disallow the "why" argument is to disallow his defense, questioning the legality of the orders.
OK, so he was free to produce any evidence supporting his claim that the orders of Colonel Robert, Colonel McHugh, and Lieutenant Colonel Judd were illegal. But Obama is irrelevant to that.
Also, to disallow the "why" is a result of Begging the Question, assuming the orders are legal.
Why would the orders of these three superior officers not be?
And why were the orders of Colonel Roberts, Colonel McHugh, and Lieutenant Colonel Judd unlawful?
“..I won’t be one of those sitting on the fence...”
Nor I, brother. I’ll be in the fighting hole next to yours.
I know that and would say that his actual birth certificate is absolute proof that he is not eligible, the COLB is and has always been an abstract copy which does not meet the burden of proof.
Lakin's fall is of his own making. I neither mourn it or celebrate it. But at the end of the day I have no more sympathy for him than I do for Ehren Watada or Yolanda Huet-Vaughn or Michael New or anyone else who feels that they can pick and choose what lawful orders they will follow.
You and Obama have much in common.
It's nice to see that your streak of inaccurate posts is intact.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
I won’t be in a hole either. :)
With those replies, you’ve proven my points. Thank you.
Wrong again.
That's a question for a whole different thread.
This is the second time in this thread that you have referred to "evidence." The Obot judge in charge of this kangaroo court won't allow any.
And even if Colonel Lind had allowed it, how would it have exonerated Lakin from refusing to obey the lawful orders of three of his superior officers? It's a simple question to answer. Have at it.
You are as deceptive as your hero Obama.
You seem to be as befuddled as your heroine Taitz sometimes.
You had points???
Well, let’s say I’ll have yer six, or I’ll take point and you have my six, howzzat, good brother?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.