Once again, Obama and Congress (including some RINOs without conscience) undermine our military, homeland security and defy the will of the American people putting the agenda of a small group of activists ahead of the will of the troops and the American people.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Innovative
When your approval rating is in the teens, you just don’t care. We’re getting closer to a time of pitchforks and torches.
To: Innovative
Obama's social experiment would have devastating effects on the finest military force the world has ever known.That's their agenda.
3 posted on
12/18/2010 2:51:15 PM PST by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS= Obama's Mosque, taxes, painful death. Is this what you want?)
To: Innovative
Congress would be better without gays serving there too.
Can't think of a good one I've ever heard of in Congress.
4 posted on
12/18/2010 2:51:33 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Innovative
How hasd this worked out in with the IDF? I remember reading an article in the NYT which said (of course) that all was hunky-dory but haven’t read anything on gays in the israeli forces for a long time.
To: Innovative
The military should have as much say
as you Americans. ... NONE.
7 posted on
12/18/2010 2:53:43 PM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Innovative
The economy near depression, the military stuck in Obama's never ending wars and extended beyond their ability and the last act the US Congress prioritized before the Christmas break is repeal of Bill Clinton's double-minded, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"? MERRY CHRISTMAS FORM THE DEMOCRATS; "Come here soldier and scrub my back!". The enemies of America have just been handed the victory they have long dreamed of, a divided military. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." A. Lincoln حفظ الله أمريكا
8 posted on
12/18/2010 2:53:54 PM PST by
Binstence
(Live Freep or Die)
To: Innovative
Once again I would like to add that this FIGHT is not over; We conservatives in the next Congress need to call Congressional-Hearnings; and really highlight to both the Military and the Public (as well as the elites in the media), the REAL and negative effects this will have on our military..
Does anyone have any links to how this has effected the British Military or others..?
9 posted on
12/18/2010 2:55:42 PM PST by
JSDude1
To: Innovative
Mighty fine looking drapes you’ve put up there, Soldier. Thank you, Sir, I sewed them myself.
10 posted on
12/18/2010 2:57:04 PM PST by
JPG
(Sarah dedicated her new book to Trig: "I'm glad you're here.")
To: Innovative
Putting the agenda of a small group of activists ahead of the will of the American people is what this administration is all about.
11 posted on
12/18/2010 2:57:07 PM PST by
Inyo-Mono
(Had God not driven man from the Garden of Eden the Sierra Club surely would have.)
To: wagglebee; little jeremiah
12 posted on
12/18/2010 2:57:43 PM PST by
JSDude1
And, perhaps most telling, nearly one-third of all those who are now part of the best-educated, best-trained, and most-combat-experienced military in history will consider "getting out" rather than serve side by side with openly homosexual men or lesbians.
It bears repeating, the goal of the LEFT is to weaken and destroy the combat effectiveness of America's military.
Any senator that supported this repeal did so willingly and knowingly.
13 posted on
12/18/2010 2:59:27 PM PST by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: Innovative; JSDude1; 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; ...
16 posted on
12/18/2010 3:06:29 PM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Innovative
To put it bluntly. “This sucks.”
18 posted on
12/18/2010 3:07:49 PM PST by
JamesA
(You don't have to be big to stand tall)
To: Innovative
For many years - everyone who enlisted to serve in the military was required to read a statement that the policy of the military was that the gay lifestyle was antithetical to military, and would be a cause for discharge from the military.
IMHO - this represents a “contract” - a condition of service - that goes BOTH WAYS.
If the Congress decides to drop that contractual requirement, then perhaps everyone presently serving in the military should be given the option to ask and receive an honorable discharge from military service - since Congress has changed the contract!
If we loose 30% or more of our military - so what. It’s not like we have a country worth fighting and dying for any more.
20 posted on
12/18/2010 3:10:36 PM PST by
Vineyard
To: Innovative
To: Innovative
Gives a whole new meaning to the following dialog common to Parris Island ... my alma mater.
DI: You eye balling me maggot?
Recruit: SIR ... NO ... SIR!
DI: I don't believe you fluff ball.
You're queer for me boy ... aren't you?
Recruit: Batting his eyes ... SIR ... YES ... SIRRRR!
31 posted on
12/18/2010 3:47:24 PM PST by
BluH2o
To: Innovative
What’s next? Legal protections for school teachers to act on their “genetic” desires to screw underage students?
To: jazusamo; Innovative
33 posted on
12/18/2010 3:53:29 PM PST by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: Innovative
The US Army if liberals and RINOs have their way....
35 posted on
12/18/2010 4:04:20 PM PST by
indcons
(Lurker mode off)
To: Innovative
In the combat arms, the queers are going to rue the day they “won” this legislation. AWOL and desertion rates for faggots will go up because they’ll be buried out on range 116 East.
For the congress - every last one of you - you are beneath contempt for what you have done to the best armed forces the world has ever known. You shall reap your just rewards in hell for this.
JMHO, of course.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson