"The working group said that having homosexuals use different bathrooms and living facilities from heterosexuals would not only create a logistical nightmare but would be discriminatory." You can expect a lot of sexual harassment and discrimination complaints in the near future. Maybe they should allow women to share men's facilites.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: mandaladon
So, who knows if one’s TSA molester is straight or gay anyway?
2 posted on
12/18/2010 6:23:29 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: mandaladon
3 posted on
12/18/2010 6:23:39 PM PST by
mockingbyrd
(Remember in November.)
To: mandaladon
Forcing this, non military, would be a world wide humanitarian crisis.
4 posted on
12/18/2010 6:23:52 PM PST by
allmost
To: mandaladon
When a "problem solved" begets additional problems, the first solution is in error.
Corn for fuel is another example of an error.
To: mandaladon
The working group must be full of homos.
6 posted on
12/18/2010 6:25:21 PM PST by
jospehm20
To: mandaladon
“We disagree that it would require separate showers” — because we are bound and determined to MAKE straights accept gays, even tho every homosexual, in their heart, knows that it is wrong, according to my friend who is struggling to leave the lifestyle.
This is the most We the People-defiant bunch of jackasses in Congress that I have seen in a long time. They should be run out of town on a rail. January will not come a minute too soon.
7 posted on
12/18/2010 6:25:52 PM PST by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: mandaladon
Uh-oh.....we're gonna be seein' more "Francis" characters coming forward now.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrllCZw8jiM
8 posted on
12/18/2010 6:26:16 PM PST by
traditional1
("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
To: mandaladon
And they’ll have to eat together, sleep in the same bunks, fire their guns at the same time, look at each other, train together...yada, yada yada.
To: mandaladon
This can’t end well.
Euro-weenie nations with their ineffectual boutique militaries can pull this stuff off. We can’t
10 posted on
12/18/2010 6:27:52 PM PST by
dennisw
(- - - -He who does not economize will have to agonize - - - - - Confucius)
To: mandaladon
You’ll see an exodus of people out of the military over this.
12 posted on
12/18/2010 6:28:33 PM PST by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: mandaladon
Note to self: Buy stock in soap on a rope company.
15 posted on
12/18/2010 6:30:32 PM PST by
AndrewB
(FUBO)
To: mandaladon
All I can say is I thank God I’m no longer in the military so they can order me to get involved in these Social experiments that are good for nothing.Espechially the military.
I hate to say this but for your own safety guys, Get out as soon as your enlistment contract ends.
16 posted on
12/18/2010 6:31:05 PM PST by
puppypusher
(The World is going to the dogs.)
To: mandaladon
This flies in the face of the USCMJ. Those rules are there for a reason. Liberalism is destroying our country.
17 posted on
12/18/2010 6:31:13 PM PST by
rbosque
(12 year Freeper!!! Combat Economist.)
To: mandaladon
This may get me banned, but fragging will have a huge increase. There is NOTHING like a spurned Queen to plot revenge. YHWH have mercy on our nation. We have now jumped the shark completely.
18 posted on
12/18/2010 6:31:44 PM PST by
runninglips
(Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
To: mandaladon
Guess this means male and female soldiers must shower together as well.
20 posted on
12/18/2010 6:33:51 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: mandaladon
If they can make this a rule they need to allow men to shower with women.
What difference is one sex object from another.
If men have to shower with men who wish to have sex with them, why shouldnt women have to shower with men?
I don’t give a good damn what happens to a fag who openly admits to homosexuality showering with straight men, What I worry about is the first straight guy to kick the shit out of some queer who comes out of the shower with him with an erection.
This can have no good side. It is detrimental and downright stupid.
22 posted on
12/18/2010 6:34:41 PM PST by
Venturer
To: mandaladon
Everybody has rights except normal people.
24 posted on
12/18/2010 6:35:59 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
To: mandaladon
Why don’t the “DOD Working Group” shower with them?!
25 posted on
12/18/2010 6:36:15 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Merry Christmas to all of my FReeper FRiends!)
To: mandaladon
Soooo, why don’t they just force heterosexual males and females from showering together?
Somehow gays are a noble class.
27 posted on
12/18/2010 6:37:11 PM PST by
Gamecock
(Christian humility consists in laying aside the imaginary idea of our own righteousness....J Calvin)
To: mandaladon
So, what happens when a heterosexual claims sexual harassment from a homosexual? We are so used to hearing about the gays being harassed and so on. Maybe, it is time to go after them. I realize the straight guys would probably rather avoid this sort of thing, but it might put things in perspective.
28 posted on
12/18/2010 6:37:15 PM PST by
ozaukeemom
(Is it 2012 yet?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson