Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cicero

The question is which of the two would it be easier for us to unseat, Sestak or Casey.


5 posted on 12/19/2010 4:11:54 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: abb

If the country’s mood is still conservative in 2012, then I’d think it would be easier to beat Sestak than Casey. Especially if they have a divisive primary.

Casey pretends to be socially conservative when he most certainly is not. But he seems to be good at getting away with it.


6 posted on 12/19/2010 4:14:36 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Probably Sestak. He’s not the son of a former governor (or however Casey is related)


7 posted on 12/19/2010 4:15:13 PM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: abb

“The question is which of the two would it be easier for us to unseat, Sestak or Casey.”

In my opinion, Casey would be the easier to beat. Sestak had enormous support from the left which caught alot of swing voters. In fact, he almost beat Toomey. Casey has been a do-nothing Senator & that will irritate people. His piss poor record would make him an easier target than Sestak. Just my opinion of course.


9 posted on 12/19/2010 4:16:22 PM PST by surroundedbyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson