Posted on 12/22/2010 1:15:42 PM PST by James C. Bennett
Despite persistent anxiety over its nuclear programme, the Jimmy Carter administration failed miserably in efforts to dissuade Pakistan from fuel enrichment and officials were left "scratching their heads" on how to tackle the problem, newly declassified documents have shown.
The recently declassified United States government documents from the Jimmy Carter administration, published on the Internet on Wednesday by the National Security Archive, shed light on the critical period in the late 1970s when the US first became aware of Pakistan's nuclear intentions.
The documents show that the Pakistani nuclear weapons programme had been a source of anxiety for American policymakers ever since the late 1970s, when Washington discovered that metallurgist A Q Khan had stolen blueprints for a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility.
The publication of the declassified documents comes at a time when WikiLeaks cables reveal the tensions between the US and Pakistan on key nuclear issues, including the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal and the disposal of a stockpile of weapons-grade, highly-enriched uranium.
Analysing the series documents of the late 1970s, the National Security Archive said the then Carter administration helped prevent a deal that would have given Pakistan plutonium production capability, but discovered that it could not do much to prevent that country from producing nuclear weapons fuel with the "dual use" technology that the Khan network was acquiring.
Senior US officials concluded that the prospects were "poor" for stopping the Pakistani nuclear programme, and within months arms controller were "scratching their heads" over how to tackle the problem.
The declassified documents disclose the US government's complex but unsuccessful efforts to convince Pakistan to turn off the gas centrifuge project.
Besides exerting direct pressure on military dictator General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, Washington lobbied key allies and China to pressure Islamabad, but also to cooperate by halting the sale of sensitive technology to Pakistan.
While Washington tried combinations of diplomatic pressure and blandishment to try to dissuade the Pakistanis, it met with strong resistance from Pakistani officials who believed that the country had an "unfettered right to do what it wishes".
By January 1979, US intelligence had estimated that Pakistan was reaching the point where it "may soon acquire all the essential components" for a gas centrifuge plant. Also, in January 1979, US intelligence pushed forward the estimate for a Pakistani bomb to 1982 for a "single device" (plutonium), and to 1983 for the test of a weapon using highly-enriched uranium, although 1984 was "more likely".
On March 3, 1979, Deputy Secretary of State Warren Christopher spoke in "tough terms" with General Zia and Foreign Minister Shahi. The latter claimed the US was making an "ultimatum".
On March 23, 1979, senior-level US state department officials suggested to secretary of state Vance possible measures to help make the "best combination" of carrots and sticks to constrain the Pakistani nuclear programme, nevertheless, "prospects (were) poor" for realising that goal.
The decision in April 1979 to cut off aid to Pakistan because of its uranium enrichment programme was conflicted by state department officials, who believed that a nuclear Pakistan would be a "new and dangerous element of instability," but also wanted good relations with the country, a "moderate state" that had contributed to regional stability.
In July 1979, Central Intelligence Agency analysts speculated that the Pakistani nuclear programme might receive funding from Islamic countries, including Libya, and that Pakistan might engage in nuclear cooperation, even share nuclear technology, with Saudi Arabia, Libya, or Iraq.
By September 1979, officials at the arms control and disarmament agency said that "most of us are scratching our heads" about what to do about the Pakistani nuclear programme.
In November 1979, Ambassador Gerard C Smith reported that when meeting with senior British, French, Dutch, and West German officials to encourage them to take tougher positions on the Pakistani nuclear programme, he found "little enthusiasm to emulate our position".
In the wake of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, when improving relations with Pakistan became a top priority for Washington, according to CIA analysts, Pakistani officials believed that Washington was "reconciled to a Pakistani nuclear weapons capability".
The National Security Archive concluded that the case of Pakistan shows how difficult it is to prevent a determined country from acquiring advanced technology to build nuclear weapons.
"It also illustrates the complexity and difficulty of nonproliferation diplomacy: other political and strategic priorities can and often do trump nonproliferation objectives," it said.
"The documents shed light on a familiar problem: a US-Pakistan relationship that has been rife with suspicions and tensions, largely because of Washington's uneasy balancing act between India and Pakistan, two countries with strong mutual antagonisms, a problem that was aggravated during the Cold War by concerns about Soviet influence in the region," the statement said.
Refusing to enter into any formal agreement with Pakistan on non-use and non-development of nuclear weapons, the then Indian Prime Minister Morarji Desai had told the US in 1979 that if Islamabad exploded a nuclear bomb, he would act to "smash it," a declassified US memo shows.
The conversation that transpired between Desai and the then US ambassador to India Robert F Goheen in a one-on-one meeting in June 1979 have been made public as part of a series of declassified documents on Tuesday.
The meeting with Desai that lasted for about 55 minutes was held at the instance of Goheen who was following the direction of the National Security Council of the White House to meet the prime minister on an "informal, exploratory and non-committal" basis.
Starting with the premise that Washington wanted to work with New Delhi to "deflect" the Pakistani nuclear threat, Goheen could get across the idea that "India is an essential part of any solution".
Desai, however, was not interested in the idea of a joint agreement on the non-use and non-development of weapons, the cable said.
Another declassified secret memo, about a June 29, 1979 meeting of National Intelligence Officer presided over by the then CIA Deputy Director Frank Carlucci, said "Indians would be strongly motivated to prevent acquisition by the Pakistanis of a nuclear capability by military force".
According to another declassified document of July 1979, with the Pakistani nuclear programme moving forward, National Intelligence Officer John Despres believed that India was likely to move more quickly in producing an "acceptable nuclear weapon," although it would take "at least two years".
If diplomacy did not check the Pakistani nuclear programme, India was likely to "improve its unilateral military options" to take preventive action, but "pre-emptive air strikes" would not be on the table unless the production of a Pakistani bomb was imminent or Pakistan had acquired "an invulnerable capability to stockpile" fissile materials, it said.
Now we are making the same mistake with Iran
Fmr. CIA Spy: Iran Will Use Nukes Against Israel, West
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2010/December/Fmr-CIA-Spy-Iran-to-Aim-Nukes-at-Israel-West-/
Carter: One failure after another.
Barry: One failure after another.
After we gave India the bomb to offset China I don’t think there was a choice as to whether or not to arm Pakistan, lest they be overrun by their more powerful cousins.
Besides exerting direct pressure on military dictator General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq....
What a joke.
How many Billions of our money did he skim for himself and his Junta?
Right. It is a joke. Any “direct pressure”, whatever that means, had to have been strictly proforma since we were completely dependent on the cooperation of the Pakis in the fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan during those years.
What’s bugging me more is I think I have the shakes.
I think I’m going through withdrawals to Free Republic Fatigue Syndrome, which is manifested by proxy errors and seeing 502/504/s and in general living like it’s the 90’s and we are on the World Wide Wait.
Arghhhhhh!
LOL
If India was given the bomb by the US, why was it under technology sanctions for more than 3 decades??
I love your posts.
I will try to find a book I have and quote the info within.
maybe tomorrow when I get home.
There is little or no info regarding any US government assistance to India’s weapons programme. Kennedy supposedly offered to help India develop a nuclear deterrent but was rebuffed by Nehru though this was before the 62 military disaster with China.
All that being said, India’s weapon’s programme would’nt have been possible without civilian technology from the US and Canada. Now you could call that as assistance in one sense.
I get where you’re coming from.
Like I said, I will try to find the book when I get home in couple of hours.
It was given to me by friend from the Hoover Institute and I found it eye opening.
Wish I could remember the name of it but I think I know where it is.
bluntly, the US did not help india get nukes. Any statement of that kind is false. There is no proof, no evidence, not even a hint
Hey I’m willing to admit to being frequently wrong and never in doubt.
Like I told Sukoi, I’ll get the info from the book I read in a few hours and get back to you guys.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.