Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer
Sounds like we're in complete agreement.

The result may be the same - treatment denied, but it’s not the same as a death panel - where treatment may be given to one, but not another.

It's a good point. From a practical standpoint, the end result may not differ in more than a very few cases. That said (call me an absolutist), if an individual or the market makes that decision it's totally different than when the government makes it. I suspect we agree on that as well.

19 posted on 12/26/2010 7:42:29 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion

“I suspect we agree on that as well.”

We do.

I think I understand what is bugging me about this. The FDA is trying to put a veneer of science on a decision that supports socialism. I think that expensive treatments like this cannot be provided to everyone without regard to cost - but to make illegal simply because there is a chance someone may be willing pay for it and get it, and that there will be many who want it, but can’t pay for it - so take off the political heat by revoking approval for anyone.....this pretends to be science when it is really barely masked class envy.


22 posted on 12/26/2010 7:49:59 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson