[exnavy]

Before DADT the UCMJ required the dishonorable discharge of openly gay serving peoples.

Now along comes DADT, now gays can serve, just don't talk about it.

Then, we repeal DADT, so gays should be dishonorably discharged again. Yet everyone says this is a victory for gays who can now openly serve. The UCMJ has not been changed, that means no gays allowed.

[truthbetold11]

more like forced and lied and cheated to get your way and americans were watching

[Christian Engineer Mass]

Right, of course!

So why is NO ONE saying this on TV?

[ROCKLOBSTER]

we repeal DADT, so gays should be dishonorably discharged again.

That's what I was thinking.

Is there additional language in the bill/statute?