But the driving force for McCain has been pure vitriol and spite.
To: rabscuttle385
I see less and less difference between jihadis and the left. Both are irrational, self-loathing angry hate-filled useless blobs of decaying protoplasm.
Other than that, they’re really nice people.
2 posted on
12/30/2010 9:43:17 AM PST by
Leftism is Mentally Deranged
(Liberalism is against human nature. Practicing liberalism is detrimental to your mental stability.)
To: rabscuttle385
So, what makes Linda Grahamnesty the The Huckster JUANnabies?
3 posted on
12/30/2010 9:44:21 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: mkjessup; stephenjohnbanker; Arthur Wildfire! March; DoughtyOne; exit82; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
In fact, in a slightly alternative universe, it wouldnt really be all that hard to imagine McCain standing on a Times Square street corner screaming at passersby that they all deserve to go to hell, or challenging random strangers to a fight to the death using sticks to determine who gets his clay marble collection.
|
The Juan McCain Truth File. "I think the Democratic Party is a fine party, and I have no problems with it, in their views and their philosophy." U.S. SEN. JOHN MCCAIN, 02 APR. 2004 FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords. This can be a very high-volume ping list at times. To join the ping list: FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add mccaintruthfile. (Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.) Republican Commissars Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless RNC shills who simply want to meet a new overlord. |
|
5 posted on
12/30/2010 9:45:39 AM PST by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain is a piece of garbage. I am amazed the idiots in AZ voted him in. I guess they like their pork and illegals killing Arizonians. Kyl is no better.
6 posted on
12/30/2010 9:47:10 AM PST by
Frantzie
(Slaves do not have freedom only the illusion of freedom & their cable TV to drool at)
To: rabscuttle385
If you read the article, from al jazeera no less, you’ll see as much as we may despise McCain, I’m glad the article sees him behaving as an enemy of Obama.
7 posted on
12/30/2010 9:47:35 AM PST by
snippy_about_it
(Looking for our Sam Adams)
To: rabscuttle385
I admire fighters. People who stand up to thugs and adversity and meet challenges head-on. But what’s admirable about a rabid dog who snaps at anything that moves?
McCain has never impressed me as principled as much as driven - driven by demons apparently.
8 posted on
12/30/2010 9:48:39 AM PST by
rockrr
("I said that I was scared of you!" - pokie the pretend cowboy)
To: rabscuttle385
McCain is OUR problem..... WHY are we posting anything from Al Jeezera
9 posted on
12/30/2010 9:48:49 AM PST by
Vaquero
(BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
To: rabscuttle385
He's Irish. They fight.
Hey, how 'bout that.
To: rabscuttle385; Admin Moderator
You publish as valid a hit piece... from the left... published in Al Jazeera?
Worth a zot?
14 posted on
12/30/2010 9:59:04 AM PST by
unspun
(It's the Sovereignty, Stu... um... art. | We are Gulag Bound)
To: rabscuttle385
But the driving force for McCain has been pure vitriol and spite.
McCain seems to despise everyone except McCain. Never once has he responded to letters while Kyl always responds nicely and even Giffords responds. McCain is totally absorbed with McCain.
16 posted on
12/30/2010 10:03:05 AM PST by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: rabscuttle385
Well, I have to agree with the basic premise.
But I'm all too happy if McCain's fury at Obama for beating him translates into his opposing whatever Obama does. Good. It may be for entirely the wrong reasons, but the outcome is beneficial.
As journalist David Corn recently pointed out, looking at McCains increasingly desperate attacks against repealing the Dont Ask Dont Tell policy of allowing gays to serve in the military only if they were as vocal as a Buddhist Monk about who they really were,
McCain practically threw a tantrum on the Senate floor, decrying this bizarro world and denouncing senators in favour of repeal
Looking as if steam would shoot out of his ears at any moment, McCain went on to exclaim that ending DADT would endanger the survival of our young men and women in the military."
Well, sorry, but the repeal of DADT, with a number of Republicans joining the gay party, was a disaster. For once, McCain had something he was entitled to be angry about.
What, he should have supported gays in the military to prove his good sense? I don't think so.
19 posted on
12/30/2010 10:06:08 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: rabscuttle385
Sounds like ‘08 was really a lose-lose proposition....
27 posted on
12/30/2010 11:03:26 AM PST by
indthkr
To: rabscuttle385; Admin Moderator
Do we have a policy to follow when posting obvious propaganda from Al Jazeera?
Seems when we use our enemy’s ally to smear our own “enemy”, something is awry.
Please advise.
Thank you.
To: rabscuttle385
Namely, that the Led Zeppelin-groupie relationship he then enjoyed with many in the media was based on a faulty premise. I don't care who wrote it or to what end, but that's friggin hilarious and dead-on target.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
34 posted on
12/30/2010 12:21:51 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
To: rabscuttle385
Of course, as Corn also wrote, Not only had McCain flip-flopped, he had become an angry crusader, seemingly full of rage at a policy initiative he once quasi-endorsed
It seemed more personal than policy -- as in he really doesn't fancy seeing a victory for President Obama, the fellow who prevented McCain from becoming BMOC. Pure horsecrap, given that McCain has also expressed willingness to work with Obama. One can find plenty of reasons to rip into McCain without making up speculative claims that are a line drawn from a single starting point - and such a line can be drawn in any direction.
But don't let the facts get in the way of opinions of David Corn ... or Paultards who hate McCain mostly for being pro-Iraq-War.
38 posted on
12/30/2010 12:57:13 PM PST by
dirtboy
To: rabscuttle385
Let me see if I'm following this correctly. So far FReepers have pinged the AdminMod twice, asked for your thread to be pulled, your source banned and you zotted. It has been declared (essentially) that only ideologically correct sources should be posted on Free Republic, which I suppose limits it to vanities posted by selected individuals, since all news sources are flawed.
I think I'm missing something. When did someone logically show where the article was factually incorrect? Or even logically refute the opinion of the author?
40 posted on
12/30/2010 1:06:04 PM PST by
Pan_Yan
To: rabscuttle385
As journalist David Corn recently pointed out... He points out many things to support his leftist worldview; however, each time I see him and or read him I can not get beyond the David "Cornhole" moniker that always comes to mind...
61 posted on
12/30/2010 3:44:16 PM PST by
DBeers
(†)
To: rabscuttle385
But the driving force for McCain has been pure vitriol and spite. So say the disordered homosexual sex is "love" crowd...
The perverts have their panties in a twist because McCain would not drink the koolaid. McCain did a bad thing?
Give it up morally devoid leftists -the writing is on the wall...
LOL!!!!
64 posted on
12/30/2010 3:58:42 PM PST by
DBeers
(†)
To: rabscuttle385
Hey, he’s absolutely right on DADT.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson