His rantings I’ve seen thus far are too garbled to qualify as developed ideology However, what there is of it is anarchist, socialistic and somewhat libertarian. Again, all of this is garbled and inconsistent — incoherence being the operative word on all I’ve see of it.
I as a high school teacher have seen 3 or 4 such mindless theoreticians per year oh, for the last 20 years or so. They make perfect sense to themselves. They like Nietzche, the French Syndicalists, some of the early anarchists, like Proudhon, and, of course, HL Mencken (while failing to understand any of them).
Yeah, I think I know exactly the type you're talking about. Interesting how they share such a recognizable cluster of influences.
Yep. Usually they are not particulary attractive people or the kind of people who get much attention, so they try to portray themselves as great intellectuals who preside over the masses.