[Seadog Bytes]

RE: "That aligns the Justice Department with data retention's more aggressive supporters among House Republicans and places it at odds with privacy advocates, civil libertarians, and the Internet industry. Those groups have questioned the privacy, liability, cost, and scope, including whether businesses such as coffee shops would be required to identify and monitor whoever uses their wireless connections."

1. How do YOU spell "T-A-X"...?
2. Raise your hand if you if you trust the Obama Justice department to refrain from using this additional information to attack 'political' adversaries, and instead use it SOLELY to monitor CRIMINAL activity... and we'll do our best to try to get you some 'help'.

[Seadog Bytes]

“soulution” = solution

[Cindy]

Thanks for the ping Seadog Bytes

[ForGod'sSake]

Good grief!!! Why won’t these ridiculous programs stay dead? How many times will we have to kill ‘em before we’re done with ‘em? I sense zombie legislation/regulation at work here. ;^)

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Seadog Bytes.

Criminal investigations "are being frustrated" because no law currently exists to force Internet providers to keep track of what their customers are doing...

...and no mention is to be made at the leftist howls when library book lending patterns were going to be studied.

[bitt]

SD! I’ve missed you!