Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Briefing: China set to bid on major US aerospace programmes
Jane's ^ | 24 January 2011 | Jon Grevatt

Posted on 01/26/2011 3:49:11 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Briefing: China set to bid on major US aerospace programmes

By Jon Grevatt

24 January 2011

Chinese President Hu Jintao's high-profile visit to the US looks set to be followed by ambitious bids from China to supply platforms to meet two major US military aircraft procurement programmes.

State-owned Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) is preparing proposals, in partnership with existing partner US aviation services group US Aerospace (USAE), to bid for the US Navy's VXX helicopter programme and the US Air Force T-X project to procure advanced jet trainers (AJT).

A lawyer who represents USAE in its dealings with AVIC, John C Kirkland – a partner at California law firm Luce Forward -–revealed to Jane's on 21 January that in both proposals AVIC would supply what would be regarded as civilian aircraft platforms that would be upgraded in the US with military avionics and, in the case of the T-X, a fire control system. Such manufacturing programmes would be facilitated under a USAE-AVIC strategic partnership that was formed in September 2010.

VXX

In the VXX programme, which was revived by Washington in February 2010 after being cancelled in 2009 because of cost overruns, the partnership are planning to bid with AVIC's 13-tonne AC-313 medium-lift transport helicopter, which is principally designed for civilian use. In the T-X programme, the bid would focus on AVIC's twin-engine L-15 Falcon AJT. In addition, USAE and AVIC are planning to market the Chinese-produced C919 jet airliner in the US as a business jet as well as a regional aircraft.

The VXX programme is worth about USD6 billion and, if USAE-AVIC bids for the contract, it is likely to be up against the AgustaWestland AW101 and the Sikorsky S-92 medium-lift helicopters. The USN is expected to procure more

(Excerpt) Read more at janes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; avic; china; tx; usae; usaf; usn; vxx


1 posted on 01/26/2011 3:49:14 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Why are we allowing our sworn enemies access to our technology? America is selling out to the lowest bidder.


2 posted on 01/26/2011 4:02:38 AM PST by panaxanax (The less people know about you, the better off you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
America Obama is selling out to the lowest bidder

Mike

3 posted on 01/26/2011 4:06:37 AM PST by MichaelP ("Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Remember, he said America needs more “humility” last night. He’s doing everything he can to humble us before our enemies.


4 posted on 01/26/2011 4:13:26 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Why are we allowing our sworn enemies access to our technology? America is selling out to the lowest bidder.


Even worse—we are allowing our enemies to SELL us our technology and weapons. I’m sure this will be allowe in order to help close the deficit. This madness is a recipe for disaster.


5 posted on 01/26/2011 4:16:16 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We can’t be that foolish.


6 posted on 01/26/2011 4:19:03 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Vote like Obama is on the ballot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

“Why are we allowing our sworn enemies access to our technology?”

Are you kidding? Just exactly what do you think Obama was discussing when he met with the Chinese leader last week?

The price of the latest technology is a few more months of Treasury Dept auctions...at 1% of course.

Congress is the basic culprit...and has been for years.


7 posted on 01/26/2011 4:19:58 AM PST by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

TREASON!!!!!

LLS


8 posted on 01/26/2011 4:23:06 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Surreal. And what’s worse is that the technology is such now that anything purchased from them could be remotely controlled or shut down by them.


9 posted on 01/26/2011 4:23:17 AM PST by mikey_hates_everything
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo
"The price of the latest technology is a few more months of Treasury Dept auctions...at 1% of course. Congress is the basic culprit...and has been for years. "

You can't blame a few good fellas for purchasing their rightful stations in life....now can ya? I hear they are handing out world class lifestyles to a few of the "unlearned" Americans..for a price.

10 posted on 01/26/2011 4:28:56 AM PST by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MichaelP

What is obama getting in return for selling us out?


11 posted on 01/26/2011 4:59:05 AM PST by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

Words fail me.


12 posted on 01/26/2011 5:03:44 AM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Meet the new Marine One:


13 posted on 01/26/2011 5:20:16 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Uhm...is anyone in Congress paying attention?

Hello...House Armed Services Committee?

Yooohoo. Does anyone think this might be a bad idea?

14 posted on 01/26/2011 2:30:14 PM PST by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson