Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RepublicnotaDemocracy

Let me first say that I support the intended purpose of this bill.

But, if tested, the SCOTUS will shoot this one down. They’ll claim that the state does not have the ability the keep such things physically within its borders and that the federal government must therefore have the authority.


16 posted on 01/26/2011 12:14:34 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan

So what.


18 posted on 01/26/2011 12:17:43 PM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.....Eagle Scout since Sep 9, 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Yeah but isn’t that what we went to war over in the 1860’s? Contrary to the belief that it was “all” about slavery.


52 posted on 01/26/2011 1:07:37 PM PST by rikkir (With his background, Obama shouldn't be allowed to serve coffee in the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson