Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RR: 46% of GOP Primary Voters Who Favor Palin Might Back Third-Party Option If She Isn’t Nominated
Rasmussen Reports ^ | January 30, 2011 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 01/30/2011 10:33:33 AM PST by parksstp

Nearly half of the Republican Primary voters who support Sarah Palin say they are at least somewhat likely to vote for a third-party candidate if she does not win the GOP presidential nomination.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; elections2012; freepressforpalin; palin; presidentialelection; sarah; sarahpalin; smellthefear; thirdparty; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-360 next last
To: Jess79
"What I find particularly hypocritical about the GOP establishment types and your position in general..."

Ah yes, the old "GOP establishment". Personally, I have no idea what that is, who they are, and where they can be found.

Whomever that may (or may not)be, what they aren't is the "Party". The Party must remain completely neutral, and they shouldn't wade into these controversy de jour, unless of course we're talking about a sitting Republican politician, in which case the Party does have an obligation to come to the defense of that person, if the person's actions are actually defensible.

Only in extreme cases - like when David Duke ran as a Republican back in the early 1990s, and the National RNC and the LA state RNC quickly and forcefully endorsed his rival - should the Party interject itself.

Every time some politician with populists positions, both on the right and the left, fails to win their party's nomination, they blame the old standby - the establishment. Frankly, I find it intellectually lazy and ridiculously tiring.

John McCain was ANYTHING but the establishment candidate, being "mavericky" and all, but he had no problems securing the nomination, and in fact, did so quite handily. If Palin deserves to win, she'll win. If she doesn't, she won't. It's that simple, and she'll have no one to blame but herself if she doesn't.

121 posted on 01/30/2011 12:29:24 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Palin has really not done a whole lot, aside from withdrawing from her elected position once the pressure got to be too much for her...

Well, that's a lie and a half.

122 posted on 01/30/2011 12:30:33 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

I held my nose and voted for McLame. If they throw up another GOP “moderate” i am done supporting the GOP on the national front. As for Palin, I would support, but there are other good contenders that I will suport.


123 posted on 01/30/2011 12:31:15 PM PST by Free_in_Alabama (The average citizen is to lazy to steal from you, instead they are asking the government to do it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samantha

Since the women of the Republican party seem to be the only ones with any cojones, the sooner we get a conservative female in the Oval Office, the better.


124 posted on 01/30/2011 12:32:09 PM PST by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
"and how close could it be if there weren’t a Perot on the ballot and Clinton gets 43% of the vote? "

It's been so long since I've read those studies, I don't know if I could accurately articulate what the basic arguments were. In a nutshell, however, most of them made an argument that Clinton would have done better than 43% without Perot, but he wouldn't have done enough to win. More simply, not everyone who was a Perot voter, was necessarily a vote against Clinton.

125 posted on 01/30/2011 12:33:54 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Breto
Pawlenty ( only looks conservative cause he is from a communist state)

The state that also gave you Michele Bachmann and a Republican statehouse. I tire of correcting people who don't know how to research, but there you go.

We're purple here. That's generally accepted by people who know what they're talking about.

126 posted on 01/30/2011 12:34:16 PM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("It's hard to take the president seriously." - Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: parksstp; All

The mainstream media wants a 3rd party to split the conservative vote which will guarantee an Obama 2nd term, a super majority of democrats/Marxists in Congress, and a socialist state.


127 posted on 01/30/2011 12:34:23 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rj45mis
There is no one out there that will be acceptable to honorable conservatives,and that is why the left wing of the Republican Party is trying to trash her. They just make us more angry with them when we see the lengths that will go to to put their candidate or themselves in there at the top.

Sarah has just begun her fight,and she has the most name recognition,and has already been vetted times 10. She is very compelling on the Campaign,and like the energizer Bunny. Her negatives will go down as the people see how qualified she is,and very intelligent with very long term,smart plans into the future. I was a Romney supporter the last time, but no more. He has no personality and the Health care thing,and 4 Sons but none in the Military hurts him with Conservatives.

128 posted on 01/30/2011 12:36:12 PM PST by samantha (If Sarah has our back, we will always have hers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: samantha
Rove,Huckster,PrissyPerino,Gingrich,Frum,Etc,Etc They cannot handle the competition even to show common decency. She got more Democrats sticking up for her than those cowardly,competition minded,overly driven scuzzbuckets.

Well said!

129 posted on 01/30/2011 12:37:14 PM PST by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
It won't be easy to defeat Obama/democrats/socialism. But the only chance to defeat Obama is for all conservatives and most independents to stick to 1 party that is the alternative to the democrat party.
130 posted on 01/30/2011 12:37:22 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: samantha

Will Palin run?Has Palin announced she is running for President?

I would support Palin if she runs.


131 posted on 01/30/2011 12:41:50 PM PST by Democrat_media (Why is no government creating a product we can hold in our hands like a cell phone..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Ah yes, the old "GOP establishment". Personally, I have no idea what that is, who they are, and where they can be found.

Whomever that may (or may not)be, what they aren't is the "Party".

You actually believe that?!? LOL!!

132 posted on 01/30/2011 12:42:13 PM PST by Jess79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

New York Times declared, “Thomas E. Dewey’s Election as President is a Foregone Conclusion.” Top pollsters predicted a Dewey win, as did leading national political writers. In fact, with the exception of Truman, everyone else was certain Dewey would be elected. Months before the election, Life ran a cover of a picture of Dewey with a caption that read, “The Next President of the United States.” Headline after headline screamed Dewey as President.

Hey Titus!.............remember this poll back in 48?! It was done by “top pollsters”.............!

I would be surprised if you could cite and quote a freeper saying “all polls are wrong’ sir. I think it more likely that somewhere sometime some freeper said “some are wrong” or “most are wrong” or “whatever”. But, Dewey vs Truman proves any freeper exactly correct who may have said “sometimes...polls are dead wrong”.


133 posted on 01/30/2011 12:44:30 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
I'm damned sure NOT going to vote for another John McCain!

This is engraved in stone, they can take it to the bank!

It doesn't absolutely need to be Sarah but if the nominee isn't reasonably conservative no way will I vote for them.

DAMN RIGHT! I wasn't going to vote for him last time, I was decided to cast my Presidential vote for Hillary!.

Then along came Sarah. Ended up voting for her and what's his face.

134 posted on 01/30/2011 12:45:12 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samantha
in 40 minutes last night gov Palin raised $250,000 for the safari club. when she runs she will repeat that with every speech she gives, but instead of her raising that money for others it will be for HER CAMPAIGN and that above all is the reason the GOP establishment hates her. She will OWE no one any favors. If she wins she wins ON HEr OWN and is beholden to no one but the people that elected her. Goldman Sachs can go jump off a bridge as far as Gov Palin is concerned.... and they know it thus she must be taken down before she can take them down.
135 posted on 01/30/2011 12:45:26 PM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

That is how the Kenyan clown got elected ,the core sat out and what little of it did vote, voted third party,Do these people want a Repeat?


136 posted on 01/30/2011 12:47:59 PM PST by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jess79
'You actually believe that?!? LOL!! "

You're right. That's EXACTLY why Mitt Romney won the nomination in 2008 - oh, wait.

We haven't had a brokered convention in a generation, or longer. If you can convince enough Republicans, and in some states independents too, that you're the man for the job, you'll win. If you can't, you won't. Old men huddled in back rooms smoking cigars has nothing to do with it, although those guys make for great fall men when incompetent candidates fall flat on their faces.

137 posted on 01/30/2011 12:48:39 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
To say that I am ashamed of their behavior is a huge understatement. I have no use for Rove,etc at this point,they are wimps that fight dirty with real conservatives because they are backed up by others of their ilk.

They all seem to act like they have bravado now that Sarah has done their jobs for them, it was not long ago they were mute and wetting their panties. She was saying what they should have been saying. They know she will not hire any of their worthless,backbiting butts in a Palin White House, so they suck up to other suck ups.

138 posted on 01/30/2011 12:49:29 PM PST by samantha (If Sarah has our back, we will always have hers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Pox

My position is quite simple. I will never, under any circumstances, vote for a Democrat. Moreover, I will never indirectly support a Democrat by either failing to vote or by wasting my vote by voting for some candidate who cannot win.

In any contest, I will vote for the most conservative candidate who has a chance of winning. So, will you be sporting an Obama sticker on your car if your favorite conservative candidate is not nominated?


139 posted on 01/30/2011 12:53:18 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: vivalaoink
If Palin gets the nomination, I will definitely vote third party.

You would.

140 posted on 01/30/2011 12:53:41 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 341-360 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson