Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Department Aims To Slash Solar Costs 75%
IBD's Click ^ | 2/4/2011 | Donna Howell

Posted on 02/04/2011 12:28:26 PM PST by Slyscribe

Aiming to make the solar industry self-supporting without subsidies in a decade and more globally competitive, Energy Secretary Steven Chu on Friday launched an initiative to try to cut photovoltaic solar energy costs 75% by 2020. And he brought out SunPower(SPWRA) co-founder Dick Swanson to talk about efficiency gains made to date.

“In the 1960s President Kennedy launched the moonshot goal, to put a man on the moon within a decade. Today we’re launching what we call a SunShot race,” Chu said on a midday conference call with reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chu; doe; solar; sunpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2011 12:28:30 PM PST by Slyscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Let me guess: a 75% government subsidy?


2 posted on 02/04/2011 12:30:37 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

I’d love this to work.

However, we must remember that it’s those folks working in the dastardly, greedy capitalist group (e.g., the smart and productive folks capable of producing value) that will produce the actual product.

The Obama-butt govt loon-lets are incapable of lighting a bulb - given the bulb, wires and batteries.


3 posted on 02/04/2011 12:33:00 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
"Hey, Kids! Let's make stuff and invent things!"
4 posted on 02/04/2011 12:33:41 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Steven Chu is a joke. So is solar power.


5 posted on 02/04/2011 12:34:54 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Considering the usual outcome of government programs, shortly after spending trillions to develop “cheap” solar energy, we can expect the sun to go out.


6 posted on 02/04/2011 12:35:42 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

What Dorks, choose something that we can see may work to spend our money, ..they have no clue and should have no money to spend, treat them like crackheads and don’t let them rob us..


7 posted on 02/04/2011 12:36:02 PM PST by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
Aiming to make the solar industry self-supporting without subsidies ...

I've been aiming to defy gravity, time, and entropy...

8 posted on 02/04/2011 12:36:43 PM PST by LRS ("This is silly! It can't be! It can't be!!" "Oh yes it is! I said you wouldn't know the joint.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

If there were any MONEY in it, private enterprise would have solved any problems years ago. But of course, Chu doesn’t understand that. When people don’t want it, it must be SUBSIDIZED!!!!!!


9 posted on 02/04/2011 12:39:31 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
To state the obvious: a great deal more R&D was required, before launching a full-scale implementation of solar power. It's still required. Implementation should not have taken place, until (at least) the economics were right. Massive government subsidies are not the answer. The oft-quoted rationale for subsidies and mandates for early implementation was that it would spur innovation. Maybe so — but, that's a very wasteful way to spur innovation.
10 posted on 02/04/2011 12:43:09 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
the DOE expects a “renaissance” in nuclear power around the world, and that the U.S needs to participate to be competitive.
“Ground has been broken on 16 new reactors around the world and the U.S. is not going to be a player unless we’re going to have a home market,”

I agree with him there.

11 posted on 02/04/2011 12:44:28 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

I can cut costs by eliminating the DOE.


12 posted on 02/04/2011 12:46:32 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Efficiency is not the important factor. Oh, it plays a part, but dollars-per-watt installed is the key.

Doubling the efficiency at the cost of more than doubling manufacturing cost puts you on the losing end.

But a cell that is half as efficient and a third the cost gets you closer (offset by larger install costs since the areas will be bigger).

If there was a way to make $$ with unsubsidized photovoltaic, someone would have done it long ago and cleaned up.

As it stands now, the production of the gear is subsidized, and the install is subsidized, and the power produced must be purchased at high rates by the local utility (another subsidy).

It might be a better “subsidy” if the government just gave individuals the hardware along with a voucher for installation, since we can’t legislate the physics of the solar cells.

Evergreen Solar announced a while ago that the free building, free land, Fed manufacturing subsidy, and state-level funding was not enough and tool their factory to China. Bye bye government investment!


13 posted on 02/04/2011 12:47:39 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
Chu is a classic academic egghead, specializing in exotica like catching atoms with lasers and such, but when it comes to macro-scale real world issues, like climate and politics and economics, he has no clue. He is the Mandarin "rocket scientist" who can't change a tire without help.

Case in point--he thinks he can make solar profitable by 2020 or whenever, by cutting costs. What does he think the Chinese and other producers will also be doing all that time? (Hint: they won't be standing pat.) He will be chasing a moving target and doesn't even realize it, thus guaranteeing failure.

14 posted on 02/04/2011 12:47:49 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
"Aiming to make the solar industry self-supporting without subsidies..."

That's easy - just stop subsidizing them. Success, in the free market, brings its own rewards. When the government steps in, the reward for success pales in comparison to the free ride that government grants presents to those that pretend to succeed but actually fail. In fact, the reward for failure is so great that people have a vested financial interest in NOT succeeding.

15 posted on 02/04/2011 12:58:21 PM PST by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
glimmer of good news from the bowels of the article, even if it's only lip service..

Chu also said the DOE expects a “renaissance” in nuclear power around the world, and that the U.S needs to participate to be competitive.

“Ground has been broken on 16 new reactors around the world and the U.S. is not going to be a player unless we’re going to have a home market,” he said.

16 posted on 02/04/2011 1:01:38 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

Chu is a smuck!


17 posted on 02/04/2011 1:05:18 PM PST by Lessthantolerant (The State is diametrically opposed to our search for a better living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LRS; All
--yep--while Chuey is at it , maybe he could change "pi" to three also--sure would make areas of circles easier to figure-

--oh, wait-----

18 posted on 02/04/2011 1:10:03 PM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe
But if we can get to, before the decade is out, one quarter of current costs ... down to this so-called dollar-a-watt target (for all costs),

Private investment, most famously by the Google Guys, already has the cost of the cells themselves down to $1 a watt.

We need to work on efficiency. The Sun's energy on Earth is 1 kW per square meter at noon on the equator. That's almost three megawatts on only a football field size. Current production photovoltaics turns maybe a tenth of that into electricity.

19 posted on 02/04/2011 1:22:47 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyscribe

And who is going to do that exactly, a brilliant inventor or design engineer? No, some bureaucratic hack who is just going to decree that they will cost 75% less in nine years.


20 posted on 02/04/2011 1:27:22 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson