Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mariner; joe fonebone
In fact, state of the art detection for "clean", weapons-grade PU239 (assuming 6% contamination of PU240) is a couple of miles, at best. And that's unshielded. Add an inch of lead and you're not likely to detect it next door.

Sailors sleep within a few feet of W-88 warheads without harm.

Yes, a Uranium bomb can be "seen" from at least 100 miles. But, for shielded Plutonium, it's virtually undetectable.

http://www.berthold.com/downloadfiles/rp/en_ieee_tns99_lb6414.pdf

61 posted on 02/14/2011 1:51:25 PM PST by Mariner (USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner

Yes, but that’s a passive detector. What if you have an “active” detector? IOW, one that scans an incoming vessel with neutrons and looks for the burst of gamma rays that come back from fissile material when hit with the neutrons.


105 posted on 02/14/2011 7:16:39 PM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Mariner

Tks.


107 posted on 02/14/2011 7:33:58 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson