Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountainbunny
Many states force everyone to pay for health care. Its pulled directly from the paycheck.

Its a state issue that he was forced to deal with.

Federally, there is no constitutional authority to get involved. He agrees with that.

If he is the candidate running against Soebarkah the America hating Kenyan born muzzie, then Romney has my vote.

19 posted on 03/08/2011 2:32:55 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: PA-RIVER
Many states force everyone to pay for health care. Its pulled directly from the paycheck.

Which other states force "everyone" to pay for healthcare?

Because Massachusetts doesn't.

Massachusetts forces taxpayers to pay for everyone's health care. On welfare or "too poor" or "too sick" or just don't wanna? ? Thank a Massachusetts taxpayer. They are the ones paying outrageous tax bills.

Not "everyone", as you claim. Middle class taxpayers.

Its a state issue that he was forced to deal with.

He was not forced to require that taxpayers subsidize everyone and their dog in Massachusetts, but he did it anyway.

Now, thanks to Romney, Massachusetts is left with huge government interventions into the private lives of citizens, double digit increases for employer health care costs, and a huge taxpayer burden.

As an experiment, however, the Massachusetts law has revealed certain weaknesses in the plan. Three areas of concern are: overreaching social planning by the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority (the “exchange”); double-digit increases in health insurance costs for many employers and individuals, and too much taxpayer money still underwriting free care.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34588.html

That article was written by Tim Murphy, Secretary of Health and Human Services Romney.

According to Murphy, while admitting the massive problems, he thinks the law can be fixed with yet more government intervention. Apparently, the people Romney appoints are about as bright as he is.

As a conservative, I'm appalled at the thought of stealing an individual's hard earned money to fund other people's lifestyles.

I'm not in favor of "overreaching social planning", either.

Your mileage may vary, of course.

26 posted on 03/08/2011 2:51:07 AM PST by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: PA-RIVER
If he is the candidate running against Soebarkah the America hating Kenyan born muzzie, then Romney has my vote.

Uh, with you it goes deeper than that:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2646355/posts

I honestly dont understand the hatred for Romney on this web site.

Im as conservative as they come and I like him.

Fire away.....

13 posted on Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:34:29 PM by PA-RIVER

So don't hit us with the usual 'vote for Romney or vote for Obama crap. You like Romney, you said so yourself. At least be honest with your pimping.

Of course, picking Romney would take Obamacare off the table as a campaign issue, just as picking McCain took amnesty off the table in 2008. But don't let the details get in the way of your weak-kneed Romney swooning (what IS it about good hair that makes people depart their senses?)

41 posted on 03/08/2011 4:00:23 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson