[Carling]

I hate the RomneyCare law, but isn’t that a matter of the state of MA constitution, while ObamaCare is under the US Constitution?

I’d need to have knowledge of the MA constitution, and its language on mandates, before commenting further.

That said, Coakley is a ditz, so if she is wrong in this filing, it would not surprise me.

[SoConPubbie]

I hate the RomneyCare law, but isn’t that a matter of the state of MA constitution, while ObamaCare is under the US Constitution?

Who really cares?

It's socialistic in nature and that makes it a bad law either at the Federal or State level.

1. The law forces everyone under penalty of a huge fine to buy insurance.
2. The law steals from Taxpayers to subsidize insurance for those who "Can't Afford" it. Legal thievery is still thievery.

Bad law is Bad law no matter the jurisdiction.

[Vigilanteman]

Correct. By Coakley's warped reasoning, a federal judge could impose gay marriage on the nation as a whole because a state judge did the same thing in Massachussets.

Like a typical libtard, she doesn't understand the principle of federalism. As the chief law enforcement officer in the state, she should know better.