Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
As to the war in Iraq, Congress authorized military action.

Sure, he is partisan, but all people are.

Bush was brought up in the article to prove the point that Obama is basing his decisions under the status that he is the sole principle in deciding military action, as per Bush.

As for the Constitutional mertis of Iraq. Authorization of force, is not a product or use in the Constitution. Congress can declare War, that's it.

10 posted on 04/02/2011 1:56:36 PM PDT by Palter (If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it. ~ Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Palter

I knew it would finallY come out-—IT IS BUSH’s FAULT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


12 posted on 04/02/2011 2:28:14 PM PDT by tsali
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Palter; All
“As for the Constitutional mertis of Iraq. Authorization of force, is not a product or use in the Constitution. Congress can declare War, that's it.”

I do not believe that a formal “Declaration of War” was ever issued in the Barbary pirate wars, either, but they were supported by the Congress.

I suspect that many of the Indian wars never had a formal declaration of war either. Please let me know if you find any.

22 posted on 04/04/2013 8:32:06 PM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson