Yeah. But Ike's B.C. was created in 1952. So it did not have the signatures of the attending physician, and/or witnesses. So it would not pass muster under the Arizona Bill.
All of the States doing this need to be very careful with their "or" provisions. By that I mean that there have to be provisions for Americans who weren't born at a hospital, with an attending physician. If States try to simply decree that everyone born at home, like Ike, or on the side of the road, five miles from the hospital, like a woman I know, cannot run for President, then the Courts will swiftly strike the laws down.
So long as a person in BO's place can still qualify for the ballot -- if his story is true -- the laws should be upheld. Absent judicial activism. And what are the chances of that? (/sarcasm)
If I had to predict right now, from most to least likely, I would say that (1) BO produces long form B.C., with some embarrassing info, and MSM media tears into Republicans for forcing the revelation. (2) BO claims that he had a long form B.C., but that it was destroyed, by court order, after one of his adoptions, then sues. (3) BO just sues.
I agree. There must be alternate ways to prove eligibility. But the important thing here is to have some definition of “natural born citizen” that can be ruled upon, eventually, by the Supreme Court.
Of course, if there are lesser issues that get in the way, any challenge might be decided on those.