Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quesney
She loves to show her cajones alright. Why doesn't she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements, instead of picking on repugnicans who can not fight her back? Oh yea, she is a girl.
13 posted on 04/16/2011 2:02:03 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kbennkc

What a tool! Sarah has been giving great arguments against Obama with facts and figures for two years and it’s laughable that you are coming to the defense of the GOP establishment- no worry, you will slip up lime your friend Pissant and say something out of place about Sarah and be gone! Lol!


27 posted on 04/16/2011 2:10:11 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
Since she has issued numerous serious and well-considered policy statements, why don't you educate yourself before spewing drool? Or maybe you're the girl.
35 posted on 04/16/2011 2:16:16 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

“Why doesn’t she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements”

Because it causes insomnia and if she gave a speech like that today, we wouldn’t be talking about it,,, Obama wouldn’t stop golfing,,and the repubs would smile as they ignored her. Thats why,,,


53 posted on 04/16/2011 2:27:04 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
She loves to show her cajones alright. Why doesn't she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements, instead of picking on repugnicans who can not fight her back? Oh yea, she is a girl.

tsk..tsk.. You haven't got a clue.

74 posted on 04/16/2011 2:45:47 PM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

But feel free to try again. If you're, ya know, man enough 'n all.

83 posted on 04/16/2011 2:51:41 PM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
Why doesn't she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements

Maybe you think she should also tie her hands behind her back?

Getting numerically wonky with the facts doesn't get you elected to the Presidency.

Being able to condense the truth into a phrase like 'death panels' is far more persuasive than going into tables and charts showing that Obaman promised way more than he can deliver.

Let the talking heads on FOX/ABC/CCN/etc argue the details.

The problem at Palins level is to frame the debate correctly, not to get wonky with numbers. The phrase 'death panel' did more to correctly frame the debate on what Obamacare means than anything that the number geeks did.

84 posted on 04/16/2011 2:51:57 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
I never cease to be amazed at how long some RINOs have hung around FR.
109 posted on 04/16/2011 3:26:12 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
I never cease to be amazed at how long some RINOs have hung around FR.
110 posted on 04/16/2011 3:26:19 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

Eh? I oft times think her biggest enemies who pillory her as nauseam are RINO pubbies within the the GOP tent.


126 posted on 04/16/2011 4:11:30 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Being an autodidact, I happily escaped the bureaucratization of intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

Cool it. This is another Palin Worship Thread.


140 posted on 04/16/2011 4:56:55 PM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc
Why doesn't she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements, instead of picking on repugnicans who can not fight her back?

A Tea Party rally is hardly the place for that, but in case you haven't actually watched the video, she did a damn good job of busting Obama's balls over his $14 Trillion dollar Democrat deficit, and his complete lack of leadership.

You don't think the beltway Republicans can "fight back"? Where've you been? They've been siding with the MSM against Palin for two years now.

158 posted on 04/16/2011 5:50:22 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc; Bigtigermike; rlmorel

“... Why doesn’t she fight with the rats with facts figures and policy statements, instead of picking on repugnicans who can not fight her back...”

kbennkc: Maybe because the GOP needs to reach down between it’s collective legs, find their PAIR OF STONES, start acting like AMERICAN MEN, and start pummeling the Rat bastards for once, instead of acting like frigging cowards and letting this wonderful LADY take all the abuse, scorn, and derision.

SHE has taken more hate than any of the so-called men who SHOULD be standing in front of, alongside, and behind her in a protective arc.

Besides Sarah, Trump is the only one with the stones to go after the fraud in the white house.

It’s pathetic. We need warriors, not politesse and “compassionate conservativism”.

We’re at WAR right now - the Rats know it and are acting like it. Our side is terrified of being called names.

So THAT’S why she’s taking it to the Republicans. And they’ve shown a GREAT tendency to fight Sarah - INSTEAD of fighting the enemy Rats. Great judgement there, eh?


161 posted on 04/16/2011 5:54:09 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

What the hell are you talking about? WE are talking about Sarah Palin not whatever fantasy you are being subjected too.


237 posted on 04/16/2011 10:07:57 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: kbennkc

Well, she supports Ryan, doesn’t she? How much support does Ryan’s plan have from the Republican Caucus? But that is not the immediate question. That is what the Republican House will do about the debt ceiling. Will they do what they did about the $100 billion cut and end up setting on a symbolic cut? How little their cuts have slowed the spending momentum of the previous Congress can be seen in how quickly spending is overrunning the debt ceiling. We are on the Titanic and speeding toward the iceberg and so far the House has not turned the ship away from the collision course.


249 posted on 04/17/2011 3:42:59 AM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson