[Sporke]

Your entire post was just silly. Is Paul wrong on some things, yes, he is. Does that make a vote for him a vote for Al Qauda, uh...no. Paul is no racist, he isn’t against our troops, etc. etc.

It’s fine if you don’t approve of Paul, but it would be nice if you would keep your gripes about him within the realm of reality.

[Bokababe]

It’s fine if you don’t approve of Paul, but it would be nice if you would keep your gripes about him within the realm of reality.

Civility and actually thinking seem to be in short supply these days on FR, thank you for both.

[BlackElk]

It is paleoPaulie's voting record of opposition to our military and his support for "gay" everything in the military that makes him an enemy of our military and his voting record and mouthing off in favor of Al Qaeda and other Islamofascists taking over whatever they please as a power base to bge used against our country without our interfering with their accumulation of assets and power that makes him a shameless cheerleader for such as Al Qaeda. If Paul is not a racist, he sure does have quite a track record of drawing their enthusiastic support (David Duke, et al.).

What you apparently r3egard as "the realm of reality" suggests a need for reality therapy.

[oneamericanvoice]

This is a board for discussion, so while you may disagree with a poster, they do have every right to post.

Paul does have some good ideas, but then goes off the left cliff. He is dangerous for our troops and America because he doesn’t understand foreign policy, for one thing. Not all veterans are authorities. I’m a vet too. Paul wants to privatize our military by issueing Letter of Marque, a practice that hasn’t been done since the 1800s.

Paul is a spoiler.