I’m going to build a levee but I reserve the right to blow it up when I see fit....would you sign right here?
I sure wish there were some way to divert that water to the Colorado River in Texas—we’re drying up around here—all our rivers and lakes are way down—at least that is the case Deep in the Heart of Texas—around the Austin-San Antonio area.
I sure wish there were some way to divert that water to the Colorado River in Texas—we’re drying up around here—all our rivers and lakes are way down—at least that is the case Deep in the Heart of Texas—around the Austin-San Antonio area.
Sounds like a states rights’ issue. There are 700 Missouri guard already on duty nearby. Maybe they should have a conversation with the COE.
Rob Peter to pay Paul?
Seriously - the flooding is a tragedy - but how come the Corps gets to play god? They built the levy to protect people and their property... so now they are going to pick and choose who’s property they protect?
is Cairo, IL not "in a floodplain"? Oh- wait... ILLINOIS...
2008- Missouri went for McCain, Illinois went for Obummer...
BS - in the time it has taken to put this plan together, and will take to implement - the orderly and complete evacuation of the town of Cairo could be carried out. This isn't about lives. It is about playing god with people's live, livelihood, and property. Cairo, Illinois is more important than most of Mississippi County, Missouri (at least one would be led to believe).
Low volume ping list
FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.
The farmer's whose land would be flooded are not Eric Holder's people.
Coincidence?
If I was governor, I’d at least send out the State troopers. It was a mistake to turn to the courts.
The best bet at this point might be to steal a march on the enemy, and blow the Illinois levees.
This bullshit of we flood your land and then we'll pay you whatever the hell we feel like is not Constitutional.
Our town had flood control applied to a scenic creek area that
had flooded before. NO guarantee of preventing ALL future floods - but new apartments built right down almost to edge
of new creek.....mistake.
This is being presented as a ‘land vs lives’ decision. There are several things wrong with this argument...but I’ll concentrate on one:
They have already evacuated 280 people from the Missouri side...and are asking another 600 to leave.
Cairo has a population of 2,800....it looks like at least 280 people in Missouri will lose their homes (perhaps 880, but I’m not sure).
So its not ‘land vs lives’. Its ‘these people are greater in number, so you draw the short straw today’.
This type of logic can take a long trip down a slippery slope....and frankly it is frightening.
Also, the article is not very clear; but I think it states the Cairo wall is 64 ft, while the river is expected to crest at 61. It should be tall enough....but apparently they are not confident it will actually hold. Whose fault is that?
I remember in 1993, there was alot of debate over whether or not the levee system caused more damage than it prevented, because those not protected by it were subjected to higher flood waters (caused by constraint between levees). I am a strong proponent of levees, and don’t agree with this line of thinking....but are there actually people at the COE who are making the case that levees actually CAUSE problems? This case seems to indicate that.
If the COE is going to start bean counting and playing favorites, I think they should look at productivity. How much federal income tax was derived from the Missouri side, vs Cairo...who wants to bet Cairo’s is a negative number. Wouldn’t it make more sense to keep the fields and destroy
Alas, I hope those barges loaded with explosives don’t simultaneously blow the Missouri levee, and send a wave which destrpys the Cairo side.
It is an outrage to consider destroying all those productive agricultural Missouri acres (R) to save that cesspool known as Cairo, Ill (D). If there is anything in Cairo worth saving, give a prize to anyone who can show it.
It's hard to think about that area of the country as being in earthquake danger, but it is. The last times the New Madrid went off, it changed the course of the MIssissippi River - and that was in the early, and then again late, 1800's when almost no one lived there (and certainly when there was no significant architectural buildup).
If it goes now, though, it would be... like... really bad, dude. From Wikipedia: In a report filed in November 2008, The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency warned that a serious earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone could result in "the highest economic losses due to a natural disaster in the United States," further predicting "widespread and catastrophic" damage across Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri and particularly Tennessee, where a 7.7 magnitude quake or greater would cause damage to tens of thousands of structures affecting water distribution, transportation systems, and other vital infrastructure.