Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

DESPITE The Houston Chronicle being ra-ra for the cameras and only including this NEWS item in their blog section AND using a misleading headline (that omits the details about accidents dropping AFTER the cameras were "turned off"), the truth is getting out there (on 790AM radio and elsewhere).
1 posted on 05/12/2011 12:31:37 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

They were higher because people are more distracted, nervous drivers knowing that they are being filmed. Anytime you add a pressure element to someone who is driving, you are more likely to increase accident rates.

But, it’s never been about decreasing accidents, anyway.


2 posted on 05/12/2011 12:35:55 PM PDT by Arkansas Toothpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1riot1ranger; Action-America; Aggie Mama; Alkhin; Allegra; American72; antivenom; Antoninus II; ...

Houston PING

Police union and other officials are citing the lack of rain for the drop in accidents and claiming that higher gas prices may also be a contributing factor. They also say that the cameras have been turned “off” yet say that they are still accounting how many people are “running” red lights. All tickets USED to go through an officer review process to make sure that the trigger wasn’t noting legal right turns on red and other legal scenarios. Without the camera footage, they cannot claim that runners have INCREASED, then again maybe they lied about the cameras being “off”.

I could just as easily cite the rise in gas prices as a reason more people are running red lights to improve gas mileage. Isn’t this fun playing “take a wild a&&ed guess?”


3 posted on 05/12/2011 12:36:00 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("If Eric Holder had his way, O-B-L would still be alive today." Thank you President Bush for Gitmo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

People only get into accidents because they follow REAL close each other trying to cram into the intersection, so when one person slams on their brakes for the camera the others domino into them. The cameras cannot make people drive stupid. They already do.


4 posted on 05/12/2011 12:36:28 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
The drop in accidents surprised Houston police administrators who say a possible explanation is the unusually dry weather during recent months has made driving conditions safer.

Or maybe people aren't slamming on the brakes during yellow lights any longer, but are instead clearing intersections normally - you know, they way they are supposed to on a yellow light.

5 posted on 05/12/2011 12:37:02 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
We have red light cameras in my town, and I sometimes stop on a yellow when I should have gone through because it's simply hard to judge on the fly, and getting one of those tickets in the mail would really piss me off. Stopping when traffic behind you is expecting you to go can cause rear-enders.

If people are running a particular red light, it means the yellow isn't long enough. Period.

Red light cameras are about the revenue, nothing else.

6 posted on 05/12/2011 12:48:51 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
They also wonder if years of electronic monitoring have made Houstonians better, if not more cautious, drivers.

LOL! That's a good one!

-PJ

9 posted on 05/12/2011 12:52:56 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Everyone's Irish on St. Patrick's Day, Mexican on Cinco de Mayo, and American on Election Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

Once red-light cams are installed, the greedy cities reduce the yellow light length into the nanosecond range, thus AUTOMATICALLY hiking tickets and REVENUE!


10 posted on 05/12/2011 12:54:50 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
The drop in accidents surprised Houston police administrators who say a possible explanation is the unusually dry weather during recent months has made driving conditions safer.

Aha ha ha ha ha...stop, my sides are hurting!

11 posted on 05/12/2011 1:03:41 PM PDT by Mr.Unique (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
As much as I would like to say that the cameras were causing accidents, and "turning them off" has reduced collisions, it's far more likely that there are other causes.

Most likely, it's Obama's fault. $4+ gallon gas cuts down on the number of people driving. Fewer drivers, and even fewer miles traveled will make for significant reductions in accidents.

The WAG from the unnamed "police administrators" about weather could also explain some things. I used to be a parts manager at an auto dealership. Whenever we had severe thunderstorms (or wintry weather in Atlanta area), I used to joke with the new and used car sales guys, "This is great wholesale parts weather!!" Many of my biggest wholesale customers were body shops.

Weather would cause reduced accident rates at all intersections, not just the ones with cameras.

13 posted on 05/12/2011 1:13:04 PM PDT by cc2k ( If having an "R" makes you conservative, does walking into a barn make you a horse's (_*_)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

The ‘red light’ cameras here in Tucson are a major hazard as drivers speed up to make the light and then slow down unexpectedly to avoid the camera and cause rear end accidents. They should be removed as they are only a blessing to the companies that install them and reap the cash benefits.


17 posted on 05/12/2011 1:22:57 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

I’ve seen people absolutely stomp on their brakes at a yellow light that had one of those red light cameras and warning signs. Actually, I’ve seen it many times.

Why? Because they don’t want to risk a “fast yellow” and have to pay a hefty fine.

THAT’s how “red light cameras” cause accidents.

But it’s just too complicated for your average politician or LSM media scum to figure out, apparently...


19 posted on 05/12/2011 1:28:08 PM PDT by piytar (Obama opposed every tool used to get Osama. So of course he gets the credit. /hurl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
Assistant Police Chief Brian Lumpkin at the podium:


23 posted on 05/12/2011 1:39:24 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

Actually the Houston Pravda had it on the front page in the newspaper vending machine. I saw the headline walking into work. I didn’t buy the paper; I don’t have a bird. I was surprised the paper had it on the front page.


41 posted on 05/13/2011 4:50:05 AM PDT by johngalt42 ("Live free or die, Death is not the worst of Evils." Gen. John Stark, 1801)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson