Posted on 05/13/2011 10:59:38 AM PDT by mojito
When he announced his candidacy, I debunked what I considered to be the top five failed defenses of RomneyCare. In his speech this afternoon, Mitt Romney employed all of them in his desperate attempt to distance himself from ObamaCare despite its stark similarities to the plan he signed as governor of Massachusetts.
Romney tried to differentiate between the national health care law, which he described as a government takeover and the Massachusetts approach, which he said was merely about expanding coverage.
But both plans are remarkably similar they force people to purchase government-approved insurance policies, expand Medicaid, and provide subsidies to individuals to purchase government-designed private insurance policies on government-run exchanges. Romney said his plan wasn't government insurance, but that's a red herring given that Congress was never able to pass a public option.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
And take Hucksterbee with you . . . couple of RINOs, better off declaring themselves to be democrats.
That dog won’t hunt.
Romney says it is perfectly OK for States to shove a requirement to purchase something just for existing but the feds can’t.
This is a very tortured interpretation of the 9th and 10th Amendments and doesn’t change the fact that romney-care is just as bad a misuse of State power.
Romney is worried about looking like a flip flopper. Never mind that he was pro life, decided to participate in Massachusetts politics and became pro choice. Then after leaving the governorship to pursue a bid for the presidency he again turned pro life.
Mitt is ignoring the First Rule of Holes. He’s still digging . . . .
Romney has NO respect for the Constitution. He is driven by a belief that the end always justifies the means.
“...they force people to purchase...”
There’s the whole problem. Even if it was constitutional, it would be dysfunctional. Forcing people to buy guarantees that they will not get value for their money.
"I'll be better in version 4.0."
"Governor Mitt Romney, who touts his conservative credentials to out-of-state Republicans,
has passed over GOP lawyers for three-quarters of the 36 judicial vacancies he has faced,
instead tapping registered Democrats or independents -- including two gay lawyers who
have supported expanded same-sex rights, a Globe review of the nominations has found.
Of the 36 people Romney named to be judges or clerk magistrates, 23 are either registered Democrats
or unenrolled voters who have made multiple contributions to Democratic politicians
or who voted in Democratic primaries, state and local records show.
In all, he has nominated nine registered Republicans, 13 unenrolled voters,
and 14 registered Democrats."
- Boston Globe 7/25/2005
Romney Rewards one of the State's Leading Anti-Marriage Attorneys by Making him a Judge
Romney told the U.S. Senate on June 22, 2004, that the "real threat to the States is not the
constitutional amendment process, in which the states participate,
but activist judges who disregard the law and redefine marriage . . ."
Romney sounds tough but yet he had no qualms advancing the legal career of one
of the leading anti-marriage attorneys. He nominated Stephen Abany to a District Court.
Abany has been a key player in the Massachusetts Lesbian and Gay Bar Association which,
in its own words, is "dedicated to ensuring that the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decision
on marriage equality is upheld, and that any anti-gay amendment or legislation is defeated."
- U.S. Senate testimony by Gov. Mitt Romney, 6/22/2004 P>
"Romney announces he won't fill judicial vacancies before term ends
Despite his rhetoric about judicial activism, Romney announced that
he won't fill all the remaining vacancies during his term - but instead
leave them for his liberal Democrat successor!
Governor Mitt Romney pledged yesterday not to make a flurry of lame-duck
judicial appointments in the final days of his administration . . . David Yas,
editor of Lawyers Weekly, said Romney is "bucking tradition" by resisting the urge to
fill all remaining judgeships. "It is a tradition for governors to use that power to appoint judges
aggressively in the waning moments of their administration," Yas said.
He added that Romney has been criticized for failing to make judicial appointments.
"The legal community has consistently criticized him for not filling open seats quickly enough
and being a little too painstaking in the process and being dismissive of the input of the
Judicial Nominating Commission," Yas said.
- Boston Globe 11/2/2006
The Massachusetts Republican Party died last Tuesday.
The cause of death: failed leadership.
The party is survived by a few leftover legislators
and a handful of county officials and grassroots activists
who have been ignored for years.
Services will be public and a mass exodus of taxpayers will follow.
In lieu of flowers, send messages to Republican voters
warning them about a certain presidential candidate named Romney.
- Boston Herald, 11/12/2006
"In 2006, while Romney was chairman of the National Republican
Governors Association - a group dedicated to electing more
Republican governors - his own hand-picked Republican successor
as governor lost badly to the Democrat, despite the fact that Republicans
have held the governorship in Massachusetts since 1990. Romney largely
ignored the Massachusetts elections and spent most of the time
during the campaign out of state building his presidential campaign.
He came back and publicly campaigned for the Republican candidate
the day before the general election!
Locally, this is a rebuke to Mitt Romney and checking out within six months
after being elected and having accomplished almost nothing,
[Jim] Rappaport [former chairman of the state Republican Party]."
- Boston Globe, 11/8/2006
It is sad how too many people are balkanizing themselves in attacking Mitt and using knee-jerk bigotry. You guys need to read the book and become better informed. It does not help to use Alinskyite tactics and needlessly confuse the issue!
[Romney is worried about looking like a flip flopper.]
Instead, he wants to become a flop flipper, totally the opposite. I think.
Yeah, Mitt. And confiscating firearms is only about “expanding safety”, right??!!
I hope I am not forced to vote for this guy like I was with Juan McCain.
Mitt sometimes no means Hell no!
The one thing I am sure of is I don’t want 0bama reelected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.