Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37

Then we had better convince Christie he needs to go for the good of the country. He would hand Obama his nuts in a debate. Particularly if they don’t allow him to use a teleprompter. None of the front-runners has a chance of being elected, and I include Sarah ( as much as I personally like and respect her) in that group.
She has the unfortunate stain of having run with McLame.


35 posted on 05/18/2011 3:12:52 PM PDT by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: vette6387
“Then we had better convince Christie he needs to go for the good of the country.”

Exactly what this country needs: amnesty, gun control and judges with radical Muslim ties./S

47 posted on 05/18/2011 3:22:46 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: vette6387

Christie would be an excellent candidate, even though I believe that he is more liberal. It is my personal belief that issue purity must take a second seat to ability to fight at this time in history.

Sarah is by no means perfect. I do not believe she was stained by McCain, however. I believe Sarah would make a viable candidate, because she has the stones to fight out in the open.

My personal preference, if I could just nominate someone myself, would be Col. Alan West.


54 posted on 05/18/2011 3:41:17 PM PDT by chris37 (awesome!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson