Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“Legislators did keep a provision that was allowed under the authority of the Trans Texas Corridor: the potential of 85 mph speed limits on certain highways that are properly engineered to handle the higher speeds.”

The TTC would have had a separation between lanes for heavy trucks, and those for lighter vehicles. I wouldn’t want to be on a highway, where semis travel at 85 mph, on all sides of me.


6 posted on 05/22/2011 7:43:22 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

As I understand it, a simple highway would initially be built, with 13-foot-wide lanes and a wide median. Then, apparently, as traffic increased, 12-foot-wide, auto-only lanes would be added on the inside, and the original lanes would be used by the trucks.


11 posted on 05/22/2011 7:54:16 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I hate politically correct sorosmonkey superheroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
The TTC would have had a separation between lanes for heavy trucks, and those for lighter vehicles. I wouldn’t want to be on a highway, where semis travel at 85 mph, on all sides of me.

Semis? Try a lot of drivers in general. 85 mph means a lot of them will be doing 90+. I've driven a lot of the 80mph areas in West Texas and even in a well-engineered car, I didn't feel safe because of others around me, especially those with just a few fingers on the steering wheel yapping away on their cell phones.

And then there is the Mexico traffic.
15 posted on 05/22/2011 8:00:01 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson