very disturbing
1 posted on
05/25/2011 4:27:40 PM PDT by
Sioux-san
Is there anything that remains of the fourth amendment?
2 posted on
05/25/2011 4:34:28 PM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Sioux-san
very disturbingIndeed. But we are living in a 'new' world now. This is not the United States of America.
3 posted on
05/25/2011 4:39:39 PM PDT by
Outlaw Woman
("...; because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee,... "Hosea 4:6)
To: Sioux-san
[...] the Indiana Supreme Court, in a less noticed decision issued the week before, said police may force their way into a home for any reason or no reason at all. They did not.
4 posted on
05/25/2011 4:41:27 PM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Sioux-san
The failed war on drugs is ridding us of the burden of being a free republic.
To everyone that supports this failed prohibition, pat yourselves on the back!! You have defeated our Founders and were able to accomplish what no enemy military could never do.....
7 posted on
05/25/2011 4:51:52 PM PDT by
KoRn
(Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
To: Sioux-san
I think Ruby Ridge and Waco taught us that the government can do anything it damned well wants to do, including murder us, without proof, trial or conviction....
if they are so inclined to do so.
8 posted on
05/25/2011 4:53:00 PM PDT by
XenaLee
(The only good commie is a dead commie.)
To: Sioux-san
This is nothing more that an assertion by the state that violence is their and ONLY their prerogative.
9 posted on
05/25/2011 4:54:05 PM PDT by
TalBlack
( Evil doesn't have a day job.)
To: Sioux-san
Very disturbing that Roberts and Thomas went along with this erosion of the Fourth Amendment, and the uber-lib Ginsberg defended the Constitution.
18 posted on
05/25/2011 5:18:17 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Sioux-san
19 posted on
05/25/2011 5:27:21 PM PDT by
Hotmetal
(Live your life to the fullest with no regrets.)
To: Sioux-san
They can make the Constitution say whatever the hell they want to, but I will hold fast to the original intent of the framers. The intended and declared purpose of the Second Amendment was and still is that the citizen may have the means by which to resist government tyranny.
That is why I practice tactical rifle, shotgun and pistol every weekend ... Let them break down my door—they will not be leaving under their own power... That’s a promise.
22 posted on
05/25/2011 5:36:09 PM PDT by
TCH
(DON'T BE AN "O-HOLE"! ... DEMAND YOUR STATE ENACT ITS SOVEREIGNTY !When a majority of the American)
To: Sioux-san
"As the lone dissenting justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, noted, this decision "arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement in drug cases." Instead of "presenting their evidence to a neutral magistrate," they can retroactively validate their decision to break into someone's home by claiming they smelled something funny and heard something suspicious".Typical Liberal. The Police are pure as the driven snow.
84 posted on
05/25/2011 7:32:44 PM PDT by
Doe Eyes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson