You’re suggesting that this gives the police carte blanche. It doesn’t. It simply says that you can’t, for example, blow away the police if you know it’s them, even if you think it’s not a legal entry. It doesn’t suddenly give them legality of illegal entry.
I am suggesting that because now “we hold that Indiana the right to reasonably resist an unlawful police entry into a home is no longer recognized under Indiana law” there is little to hold the police in check; in fact, the police *COULD* barge in (illegally, because the high court says UNLAWFUL POLICE ENTRY) and start verbally abusing you trashing the place, doing EVERYTHING it takes to push your buttons and when you explode WHAM-BAM it’s “assaulting an officer” and maybe “resisting arrest” and *IF* they decide to let you live to tell your tail then you can go to court, yes.
( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2724169/posts — Dead men tell no tales. )
What I am ASSERTING, and [I believe] have proven, is that this decision IS ILLEGAL and could/should be prosecuted under full extent of the law.